Good evening,
voki, forgive me ... (just watching Shopping Queen)
The commonality is the free market in Germany which is strongly oriented by supply and demand.
Yep - but there also has to be a solvent buying public, otherwise the free market economy doesn't work. This (buying public) in recent years, regarding house construction, is significantly due to the low interest rate phase as well as initial 100% financing with 1% repayment.
In single-family house new construction you ignore that and only write that in a good market the bad builders benefit
I can't stand it when my words are twisted at will ... haven’t I often enough already written that the cheap builders have a legitimate place in the market?
and as soon as the market overall weakens, they disappear from the market
Where did I write that Heinz von Heiden & Co. disappear from the market?
and the rest therefore do not come under margin/price pressure because enough good business remains for them.
That is a law of functioning economy: companies that manage their business reasonably remain in the market.
Here again your text as a reminder:
You should also read WHAT is written in the quoted text, and NOT what you want to interpret it as.
I am of the opinion that you once called Viebrockhaus a reasonable competitor.
But yes.
Look at the balance sheets, then you will see an improvement of the gross result within 6 years by almost 50%.
I know the balance sheet ... and I can read it; I have learned that once.
How is that supposed to work if the company does not benefit from the good construction boom but only "Billigheim & Co" have well-filled order books?
Are you sure that you can also read balance sheets?
Viebrockhaus of course benefits with its sponsored house series from the current boom. The well-established name and the volume make it. It has to, Jette, model houses & co. have to be paid for. With their surcharge policy of the "regular" catalog houses they do not manage that.
Just as true is that cheap builders & co. are experiencing the best times in a long time; they currently do not need to have bums buy on credit.
see above
No; Butter with the fish! (Tell it like it is!)
If now in your opinion only the top 1-2% of the construction companies are good/serious, then the statistic is of course worthless. Above you didn’t want to hear that again?!
Again - where did I write that "only" 1-2% of the nationwide active construction companies are serious?
Rhenish regards