SaschaL
2021-01-28 19:23:34
- #1
Yes, the state building code states that an eaves overhang is considered a "subordinate building component and is not included in the calculation."
But there was a 2018 ruling where someone apparently went too far: He had about 1.80m and was then required to reduce it to a maximum of 0.50m - since then that would be assumed. According to the ruling, because the law - even if it does not say so explicitly - is of course not meant to allow an eaves overhang of any size. 0.50m is sufficient.
Well, if that's the case, it certainly doesn't get easier. Should I also find something in the state building code about parking spaces arranged one behind the other? I couldn't find anything about that online?!
But there was a 2018 ruling where someone apparently went too far: He had about 1.80m and was then required to reduce it to a maximum of 0.50m - since then that would be assumed. According to the ruling, because the law - even if it does not say so explicitly - is of course not meant to allow an eaves overhang of any size. 0.50m is sufficient.
Well, if that's the case, it certainly doesn't get easier. Should I also find something in the state building code about parking spaces arranged one behind the other? I couldn't find anything about that online?!