pagoni2020
2021-05-06 11:31:30
- #1
"Forced" is usually a less sensible approach, in any direction, and no one should/wanted to point fingers; that is definitely not how I meant it. I am simply sharing my quite diverse, also personal experiences with young people. That may sound somewhat harsh, but it is quite the opposite, because young people often have problems in life when the usual and comfortable support (not only financial) disappears. A young person who is always aware of a kind of "all-round security" in the background is, in my opinion, at least at risk of not thinking deeply enough about things that will inevitably confront them eventually. That I put it this way does not mean I want to set myself up as a prime example; rather the opposite; nevertheless, this is my experienced conviction. It is of course not "wrong," I just mean that in the long run, for a young person's life, "less can be more," and if we want to make life easier for young people, we may UNCONSCIOUSLY hinder or slow them down. I repeatedly deal with young people who hardly manage to maintain the standard of living or luxury they were used to in youth in their "new" independent life; perceived setbacks are usually very hard to bear.You can also overdo it with forced independence. I see absolutely nothing wrong with supporting your own children. As a rule, you have usually experienced this support yourself beforehand. If you don't have the possibility, okay. But then you don't need to point fingers at other parents saying they are raising absolutely dependent children.
Exactly this "phenomenon" described by is what I wanted to illustrate, especially because I have experienced it in many ways AND with my own children as well; perhaps I did not find the right words :D. The moment we could no longer help financially due to personal circumstances, the knot noticeably burst for the young ones, even though it hurt me deeply not to be able to help them as much as was more usual among their friends. Looking back, they are also aware of this, so it does not come from me alone.The question is until when you support them. Until the end of school - in my opinion, definitely. A 15 or 16-year-old in vocational training - I also think still (although it would already be legitimate to require household money). A 27-year-old long-term student - I have my doubts that you are doing him any favors by supporting him.. Looking back I have to say for my own development that I was supported for too long (until 27 exactly). I only really got going when my father could no longer support me. At the time I of course thought it was annoying, but today I can say that I needed that push into the cold water in order to finally learn to swim. And even to learn that I enjoy it.