bowbow91
2021-05-07 11:59:41
- #1
The dropout (one of the best decisions of my life) thinks: Students could well pay something; why should they have an almost free education – financed by the tax money of those whom they will later govern/command/maybe dismiss? This does not only mean the repayment of Bafög, but also the costs of the universities borne again by the public (tax money), including the salaries of the staff. In most cases, after graduation, there is at least an income measurably above the median. It would therefore be quite appropriate, as a beneficiary of this system that is very favorable worldwide for students, to “give back” a significant part. Managers later tend to be homeowners rather than supermarket cashiers.
Such nonsense, a degree course should be free like any other vocational training and open to everyone! Additional costs only create another obstacle.
Universities fulfill not only an educational but also an important research mission from which especially the economy benefits the most. Our education system as it is, is the reason for this country's economic strength.
I would also like to point out that the dual universities (DHBW) are public universities. The costs incurred for dual students are therefore borne by taxpayers just like at all other public universities.
Many students at university have to support themselves because their parents do not have enough financial means. If you are not a dual student, this usually means a lot of work alongside studying (for example, I always had to work 20 hours a week in order to finance everything). Added to this are lectures, etc., as well as very stressful exam periods.
The dual student is, of course, fully paid and excused from work during lecture periods. My flatmates who studied dual were practically in permanent party mode during the lecture period. So if the lazy student often portrayed actually exists, then he studies dual.