BackSteinGotik
2021-05-05 22:38:07
- #1
A scientist can only think one thing about this calculator: Seriously?
Referring to a "needs-weighted" income for 4(!) children to the whole population is so bizarre that it’s not even wrong.
You’ve got to have ideas...
It’s really interesting; I’ve come across this several times in different places – I used to think that children generally cost money and that they don’t finance themselves through child benefits/tax exemptions. But thanks to needs weighting, social mobility is achieved – albeit only in the statistics. The old DINKs can wait in line behind that.. ;)