Floor plan design single-family house on south-facing slope

Do you think it’s very windy there? Because of the westerly wind or is it a particularly stormy spot? Do you know something we don’t?

I can be wrong too. But if I imagine the plan including the elevations, opposite the access road to the residential area, shortly thereafter the junction into his street, sight triangles with distancing vegetation, the terrace perched on a pedestal in the shape of the garage that is not buried, then in my mental cinema you often don’t need to turn the newspaper yourself. There can be more than just spring’s blue ribbon fluttering there.

What about this placement of the garage?



Would that be allowed? Then you just drive the cars up the hill - no problem. That way you would have maximum perimeter development and the entire south side free... and put the living room in the basement right away. *duckandrun*

In case of lack of imagination:

The solution would be really great now. However, I unfortunately fear that the garage may not be allowed to be placed on the street-side property boundary. And the driveway will be quite long and possibly also somewhat steep.

In case of lack of imagination:

I don’t find your idea wrong, but I’m afraid it will be difficult to implement due to the following points:
-Max 15 m boundary construction (of which max. 9 m per side) allowed, with the planned dimensions I would be at 17.73 m total length, although you might still be able to plan it down so that you reach the max. 15 m, but then at the expense of the size
-When building directly on the boundary, may I completely detach from the building footprint? I don’t know if your proposal fits the building footprint (see attached sketch)
-The floor area ratio is nearly exhausted with the originally planned design, here an additional half double garage (almost 40 m2) would be added, plus the courtyard in front would probably have to be designed somewhat larger because of the slope situation, for that the long path to the front door on the north side would be omitted... that would have to be calculated/planned

Once more briefly about the spacious wellness/fitness area: I have been doing sports for min. 7-8 years at least 3-4 times a week for at least 1 hour per session (cross trainer, dumbbells, cycling...). So in principle, the room would be used intensively and not just as the next step towards the desired activity.

The wish here is that it is designed so that it is a bit more pleasant/spacious.

Regarding the way to the car: The “I forgot something in the car and have to run back” is negligible or does not apply here.

And what a terrace facing south/west means is well known. My parents’ house is about 800 m on the same mountain with an identical terrace situation. Therefore, I know very well how and when the sun stands and what that means for the usage behavior of the terrace.

Border development here would be 8+6 = 14. How do you get 17+??? Or have you already fully planned your garage inside? That wouldn't surprise me... Men.

The question is rather whether you are also allowed to build up to the boundary on the street side, as Kerstin already doubted and so do I. But it would be funny. Boom, up the hill - brrrummm.

Don’t you have the +50% floor area ratio rule for ancillary buildings? Sorry if you already mentioned it. It’s easy to get confused when following several threads.

Sure, you can build away from the building plot – that’s why it’s called border development and that’s what makes it so attractive. Unless the development plan explicitly prohibits it.