Where is the improvement? The child moves out in 4 years, and then you have a bedroom upstairs as a passage room, only with skylights, where the bed can’t even be placed against the wall and the storage room is hardly accessible. It would make more sense here to swap the bedroom and the dressing room so that the bedroom at least gets a proper window facing a reasonable east direction. Strange offsets/recesses in the rooms... bathroom, office... you could actually straighten those out to advantage. How can an architect manage something like this? What could the tiles in the kitchen be meant to indicate? Guests have to walk around the stairs to get to the toilet (mind you, it was 10 visits a year), the cloakroom is only named as such but can only hold a few hooks or shoe racks, the kitchen has no access... kitchen, dining, and living have over 60 sqm, on average 20 sqm more than a standard-sized house, but I see no benefit. Even the guest room with 10 sqm isn’t exactly spacious... The basement has an almost insignificant hallway extension, normally you would shorten that and access the boiler room from the basement? And was the fitness room also a sauna? Then as a fitness-sauna user you have to go through the sandy hallway where the car is parked daily and go from bottom to top with street shoes to use the toilet or shower in your wellness fever. I see the first floor plan, just slightly changed. To me, everything somehow seems illogically conceived from the start. And the execution: many edges where there don’t have to be any. P.S. I didn’t read everything anymore... after a month you don’t remember if it’s a real architect or why the driveway is done from a different side than the entrance... How can it be that a planner doesn’t simply position the windows and doors sensibly from the start?