Make a counterproposal.
Unfortunately, my kitchen sense is only enough to recognize what is botched - I am not the kitchen specialist. Besides, I share Yvonne’s assessment of how grateful the ground would be for such effort.
The attentive observer sees no connection between the garage and the house in the current plan (from last night).
The attentive observer sees merely a “crossed-out” passage door there, but with the rigid axis house-garage fully preserved.
That means right in front of the only sensibly usable windows of the living room?
Who says there is a living room there, or even its only sensibly usable windows?
You are fettered and gagged, fixated on your botched draft.
I have time and a very good spatial imagination.
You don’t have that, and I see that crystal clear without glasses. Otherwise, not only I, but you yourself would have long since painfully realized what fundamentally fails in the draft - and that is not the financing buddy who is only authorized to decide up to 160 sqm.
Namely – and I already saw this when I turned the corner to the entrance of this thread:
The house has a continuous depth that extends from the house body over the intersecting garage to the garage body.
To the south, the boundary distance limits the possible depth and effectively sets this measurement for the whole ensemble in a rectangular floor plan.
The real corset rods you then push in by, first, coupling the garages to each other, and second, also storing them so they cannot be shifted against the house body.
If you had even a hint of checking for homeopathic causalities, you would notice that the dimensions of the utility room and the location of the refrigerator are merely metastases of this ankle joint stiffening.
Panta rei also applies in reverse: this floor plan suffers from chronic constipation – take the stick out of the chakra!