Prioritizing horticulture. Do you want to have the entire garden planned?

  • Erstellt am 2018-05-01 19:20:29

jansens

2018-05-30 23:07:49
  • #1
I also find the malice inappropriate. The user is simply reaching for a “higher shelf” with his house construction than most here, and accordingly, his understanding of the necessary standard. So what?

And if I don't want to provide any personal effort for the outdoor facilities and, as with the rest of the house construction, commission a "move-in ready" garden, it easily reaches six-figure amounts.
 

Fuchur

2018-05-30 23:17:02
  • #2
for a pool at €70,000, yes. As said, almost anything is actually possible.
 

haydee

2018-05-30 23:17:15
  • #3
Have you ever looked up Japanese gardens on Pinterest? There are some really beautiful, modern water features.
 

R.Hotzenplotz

2018-05-31 00:48:36
  • #4


What do you mean by that?

I think a pool is initially rather out of the question. €70,000 and up is too expensive and I consider €30,000 to be too optimistic. Maybe those are the pure pool costs but like with the house, you will probably have to see all the additional costs as well. Something like what's pictured here you can never, ever get for that price or am I mistaken? There also has to be ground around it, etc.

I will discuss this again in the planning meeting. Better to first finish the immediate vicinity, in a second step do all the planting and create a seating area as well as play options for children, and in a third step maybe build a pool mid-term. He says that from an effort standpoint it's stupid, you should rather do the pool right away. But it is rather the last priority. As I said, you have to calmly discuss the pros and cons. I find it a bit exaggerated to build a pool and then have no money left for the terrace.



No, not yet. The gardener also recommended Pinterest to me and I just signed up and have to get familiar with it first. My wife says now, if water, then a pool. Actually, she hadn't cared much about it but pure water in a basin only for decorative purposes doesn't appeal to her much.
 

haydee

2018-05-31 01:07:52
  • #5
I don't think water features are bad. They definitely provide a recreational value until the pool comes in the medium term.

You can also get a pool for 30,000, it's just mid-range.
 

Kekse

2018-05-31 06:25:14
  • #6
I find it unfortunate to catch up on the pool in the medium term. Just when everything is nice, the excavator comes again and tears everything apart.
 

Similar topics
01.01.2010Ground-level pool instead of bathtub?19
24.10.2016Room in Pool Concept21
08.01.2019Heating solution for large single-family house with pool31
22.08.2022Pool in the garden? - Need inspiration!73
19.07.2023Drain the pool - experiences - ideas?28

Oben