11ant
2024-03-04 15:55:19
- #1
Exactly for this reason, we approached two architects, of course without bringing our own designs, but we are not happy with the result. [...]
We would allow other possibilities, which is why we were with two architects, but unfortunately nothing better came out of it. [...]
That was actually not even our consideration, but the builder’s.
We asked the architect for an alternative design. We made an effort not to subconsciously incorporate our floor plan into the specification sheet. [...] Regarding the basement, we only mentioned that the technical room should be near the supply line and that the builder advised us to cellar the garage because that would hardly cause any additional costs.
We provided the architect with the room program, the desired style, our daily routine, and some details. We also visited the plot together with her.
I already read much too early about construction companies here. Do you really have two architects, or one architect and an "architect," or even two "architects" (= permit preparers chartered by or employed by the construction company, aka drafting clerks)?
The urgent recommendation to go to architects without bringing your own designs does not mean to withhold your own designs entirely. The important thing is simply not to "prime" the architect with them. After they have presented their draft ideas, you can safely lay your own sketches on the table (and should even expressly do so to illustrate examples of varying satisfaction with the results). From the discussion “why different and not like that” and “we were more satisfied with our amateur idea because,” all involved parties can only learn (and the clients see how competently the architect responds).
What builders propose is often regarded by their potential clients as the best-tested ideas from the box of experienced practitioners, optimized for the clients’ efficiency; in reality, it is mostly a solution that they have in their own drawer and can implement with the lowest subcontractor demand, and primarily it’s about quickly clearing obstacles on the way to signature. Execution can be well discussed with contractors, but planning is wiser with planners!
The builder constructs in solid construction or, in cooperation with a carpentry, also timber frame.
Who is in charge there, does he then mediate the carpenter essentially as a general contractor-subcontractor for shell construction?
Area: Ingolstadt
We have had Ingolstadt here in as well as and – to my recollection, there were also several mentions of suitable builders.
Unfortunately, I did not mean that one.
The one I meant really has the living/dining area downstairs. Recently posted some pictures of the almost finished house.
Did you then perhaps mean: ?
We actually mentioned a terrace, but not necessarily an elevated one.
Then be very specific: why don’t you want to build into the slope, but rather hovering above the plot?
Well, Siemens air hooks have persistent delivery difficulties. And I can only join the question.