kaho674
2018-07-14 12:48:40
- #1
... throw it in the bin.If below (terrace) is SO, then I would rotate and mirror quite a bit... the whole design
Floor plan design / draft single-family house flat roof with double garage
- Erstellt am 2018-07-13 16:19:23
face26
2018-07-14 12:58:00
- #2
Again about the garage: I wouldn’t take the west side for the living area because of a garage. If the terrace is SE downstairs, then I would rotate and mirror quite a bit... the whole design
...I had completely overlooked ... so you have SW / W on the ground floor as the only “opening” the front door? Phew, I would think about that again....
ypg
2018-07-14 14:06:47
- #3
Exceptions The following buildings (structural installations) have no own distance areas and are also allowed within the distance areas of other buildings:
- [*] Garages including storage rooms and buildings without habitable rooms and fireplaces, with an average wall height of up to 3 meters, a total length per property boundary of 9 meters and a total length per property of no more than 15 meters
11ant
2018-07-14 14:28:12
- #4
Floor area ratio: 0.4 / Plot ratio: 0.3 / Building window, building line and boundary: No
Nonsense, someone here can't read development plans.
150 sqm should not be exceeded due to construction costs.
Unfortunately, 120 sqm per floor (!) is already almost the minimum to afford a space eater like a straight staircase. I wouldn’t even consider something like that below 12 (with a recessed belly also 10.5) meters house width.
The setback distance of the garage is absolutely unnecessary.
The bedroom in #8 (left) does not work. You’d need a robot like in high-bay warehouses to remove the sleepers from their beds.
Kabelmodem87
2018-07-14 15:18:45
- #5
Nonsense, someone simply can't read development plans.
Unfortunately, 120 sqm per floor (!) is already almost the minimum to afford a space eater like a straight flight staircase. I wouldn’t even consider something like that below 12 (with a recessed belly also 10.5) meters of house width.
The setback of the garage is absolutely unnecessary.
The bedroom in #8 (left) doesn’t work. You’d need a robot like in high-bay warehouses to take the sleepers out of their beds.
There is no development plan.. only a positive preliminary building permit, which states the following..
The 120 sqm minimum for a straight staircase, in your personal opinion? If we take a quarter-turn or half-turn staircase, don’t we gain 20 sqm of floor space per story? Or are all houses under 100 sqm per floor then also not worth building?
I don’t quite understand how you come up with that number.
Kabelmodem87
2018-07-14 15:24:35
- #6
So, as you want to build and the example photo should allow for a boundary development. After all, the garage will not be part of the house, but built outside the thermal envelope. If the technical room were behind the garage, then not. Nevertheless, the garage will be a major cost factor. Consider that more space is allocated to the cars than to the children. I would reconsider that in your place.
I would also avoid a straight staircase.
Personally, I don’t find it bad if the staircase starts in the dining area – what I find important is that the sofa is out of the line of sight.
Again about the garage: I wouldn’t give up the west side of the living area because of a garage. If below (terrace) is SE, then I would turn and mirror quite a bit... the entire design
Thanks for the objection, especially the one regarding the distance from the garage.
Regarding the children's rooms, we are against the widely held opinion in this forum that children's rooms must be >15 sqm; cars are also many times larger than our children and simply need a fixed area. I grew up with my brother in a 10 sqm room and didn’t have a bad childhood. But everyone has a different attitude towards this.