Financing construction projects - Enough equity?

  • Erstellt am 2021-03-20 14:26:42

WilderSueden

2021-03-27 18:48:10
  • #1
3 children who learn together regularly are significantly fewer contacts than 30 children in a classroom. Who might then still be mixed with the parallel class for French and Latin because some take French and others Latin ;) The fact is that many parents can hardly manage to teach their children at home alongside a full-time job. Accordingly, the children are then sent to emergency care. I know exactly one family that did not send their children to emergency care this winter, and in their case the mother is a housewife. All the others work full-time and thus meet the requirements for emergency care... But if in the end three quarters of the children are in emergency care, you might as well keep the school open.
 

BiffBiff

2021-03-27 19:52:40
  • #2
How do you know that 3/4 of the classes are in emergency care? That seems highly exaggerated to me.
 

chand1986

2021-03-27 19:57:34
  • #3
Is also exaggerated. Especially since emergency care means a different distribution = lower density. What is missing is predictability and consistency so that routines can be established. A new decision every three weeks with new requirements kills any efficiency of teaching.
 

WilderSueden

2021-03-28 19:15:29
  • #4
It was once reported like that on SWR. My sample is definitely above that. An acquaintance who works in kindergarten also had quite full groups. However, there is certainly a difference depending on age, the older the children the less emergency care. The fact is: emergency care is much more than just real emergencies. In the end, those who stay home to take care of their children and thus reduce their working hours are the ones who lose out.
 

BiffBiff

2021-03-28 23:00:01
  • #5

Source swr:
The union Verdi currently estimates the average occupancy of daycares in Baden-Württemberg at 40 percent.

I really doubt your 75%. My "sample" is at most 3 out of 200 students.
 

Evolith

2021-03-29 11:33:30
  • #6


Believe me, I manage IT with 5 colleagues in a large company. No, by far not everyone has a PC/laptop and if they do, you want to cry from nostalgia because they remind you of Windows 95 and older. Sure, the colleagues probably bought their special requests regarding mouse, keyboard, or lamp themselves for home office. But the basic equipment must be provided by the employer. Not least so that everything is on the same level regarding security and support. (Fun fact: setting up each person’s private monitor as a dual monitor via Teams borders on self-harm).
Now let's bring that down to teachers: every teacher has their own technical stuff set up to get Teams and co. running. Everything from Windows 7+ to Linux/Apple is included. Now the IT person responsible (a parent/teacher) of the school is supposed to coordinate this. You don't stand a chance of doing this even remotely satisfactorily. On top of that, we have many senior teachers. It is already a challenge to explain to them how to install software. So you need an incredibly long time to make them digitally capable of working. But you also can't expect them to do it themselves. Many are so behind that it totally overwhelms them. Google and a YouTube video don’t help here either.
The students are the smaller problem. For them, it simply boils down to lacking infrastructure.

About the "IT stupidity": years ago my mother-in-law had her entire desktop plastered with empty folders. Why???? Because she didn’t know they could be renamed and she wanted to name a folder specifically but kept misspelling it. She also wasn’t sure if she could just delete the empty folders and didn’t dare to just try it.
 
Oben