...
And the second mistake one can make here: or rather many make: not sticking to their own plan.
Like for example "You only build once" and then a few euros more here and a few euros more there...
What is reflected in you in "would like a bungalow," "looking into the green, -> east, south," etc. [emoji6]
These are already statements that make building more expensive or can make it more expensive.
Since I cannot quote everything in Tapatalk, I will do it from memory in the text, just what stuck with me.
And it is like this, that a bungalow is nice and practical, but also more expensive than a one-story house with attic conversion.
And even if I don’t see where it is being built and prefer to stay out of these regional discussions up to a certain point, I must/can say
A) the building window is too small for an (efficient) bungalow
B) if a bungalow is to be built, it will only be an architect’s house, which must be planned very skillfully and therefore is not cheap!!!
Then there are some conditions from you "nicely built into the green." I would like to say that it depends on you to design every corner of the plot green. From every window one could look into the green. So one should not restrict themselves with a problematic plot with a corset, restricting oneself with an average 5-meter building depth even more, when many things are linked with conditions. Of course, one wants the optimum, but here one cannot necessarily do other than what is possible [emoji6]
Every corner of the plot is worth appreciating. So the north may house the trash bins, in the east you could place a greenhouse, and in the west a barbecue area and a sundowner terrace could be created.
For an entrance area, 1.20 m is too small. I come from an apartment and an end terraced house, so I am not exactly used to exclusivity. 1.20 m is just enough for a front door of one meter width without side windows! It is not enough to spread out and feel comfortable. I would be annoyed to have to enter such a house every day.
That’s about the hallway.
One might think it can’t be done differently than lining up the rooms one after the other here. If it is so, then one should be able to stage this disadvantage.
I sketched once. If you don’t get the numbers from the thread starter, you have to work with sketches and estimates. I did that, and it was not exactly what I and others here expected.
The building window definitely does not play in the league of cost-effectiveness. A building with attic conversion is more effective and – to be honest – also not bad to live in.
Regarding the requested costs: turnkey today usually means what is offered without floor coverings and painting.
A shell is without plaster and screed, and also without installations.
Since you mentioned "water connections and electricity," I think an offer at your place could be "technically complete."
That means: closed shell with technology inside, including heating. Everything else is then up to you. But that can also mean the exterior plaster and many other things; a lot of information is missing here. And yes: that can easily mean an extra 50,000 or more in additional costs in EL.
Connection costs for water, electricity, and gas come separately and are calculated with the connection utility as part of the incidental construction costs, where earthworks, etc. also appear.
Certainly, I have now forgotten some noteworthy components...
Attached is your building window in a sketch according to the site plan information.
I also sketched a possible layout, where corners outside the building window are also found (south), which should definitely be submitted by an architect with rhetorical and technical skills.
That reminds me that you wrote elsewhere (topic building application) that you adhere to your plan according to the development plan and do not need approval... I see this differently here because every boundary crossing must be fought for here.
Attachment coming right away...
All well and good: but kitchen and pleated blinds do _not_ belong to the incidental construction costs, please.
That belongs to personal furnishing, just like lamps.
Built-in lights may be an exception...
Outdoor facilities are also a separate item.
Calculable for the bank:
Plot
House
Incidental construction costs
Outdoor facilities
Garage/carport
Everything else you have to have ready:
Furniture, kitchen, lamps, ancillary purchase costs