Matthew03
2018-09-27 12:35:22
- #1
Here, a lot is mixed up, in my opinion, it should be more differentiated...
The income and the desired installment are realistic, better would be max. 1200,-, then you are at roughly 37-38% housing costs including additional costs and some reserves, which is sporty but possible.
The required total capital of 360,000,- also roughly fits in my opinion and is not completely unrealistic.
The loan-to-value ratio with non-liquid but high equity of 140,000 is very, very good, there are plenty of banks that appreciate that!
The only thing that doesn't fit at all are the pure house costs of allegedly 200k. But in this case that is not even decisive, because with 360-45 (land) - 50 (ancillary construction costs) there remain about 265k for the house. At 2000,- / sqm that would be 132 sqm living space. The floor coverings and material for painting unfortunately will then go for the wedding.
My conclusion: clarify how the house costs are supposed to come about, postpone the wedding or postpone the start of construction or finance 380k.
The income and the desired installment are realistic, better would be max. 1200,-, then you are at roughly 37-38% housing costs including additional costs and some reserves, which is sporty but possible.
The required total capital of 360,000,- also roughly fits in my opinion and is not completely unrealistic.
The loan-to-value ratio with non-liquid but high equity of 140,000 is very, very good, there are plenty of banks that appreciate that!
The only thing that doesn't fit at all are the pure house costs of allegedly 200k. But in this case that is not even decisive, because with 360-45 (land) - 50 (ancillary construction costs) there remain about 265k for the house. At 2000,- / sqm that would be 132 sqm living space. The floor coverings and material for painting unfortunately will then go for the wedding.
My conclusion: clarify how the house costs are supposed to come about, postpone the wedding or postpone the start of construction or finance 380k.