No, I don’t. Because it is exaggerated, but it clearly shows the everyday madness when someone just wants some peace and quiet. My goodness, how do you even live? While one person wants to have peace from his wife and her followers every third evening, another just wants to quietly get through his sleep session. Not only children want to seek peace in their sleeping den, adults especially want a few hours of sleep for themselves, whether sick or healthy, morning or evening, stressed or not... and then someone always somehow has to walk through the bedroom.
I’m just fed up with offensively writing the obvious. The builder needs to use his own brain: a bedroom should no longer be a passage room. Never!!!
That is completely exaggerated. Who should be walking through there?! Fictional cleaning help who, if they existed, would come once a week and apparently exactly then, when the head of the household could unexpectedly lie in bed for an hour ... oh dear, God gave us language (or WhatsApp, or whatever). Closed door can simply mean closed door - like in a hotel - that can also be arranged. Who actually let the cleaning help in?
On-suite bathrooms simply have the characteristic of being accessible through the bedroom. That is the PURPOSE of an on-suite bathroom and therefore it makes NO SENSE to complain about this characteristic. Besides, I don’t think this house has a problem with the number of toilets. If it really came down to three steps (and it doesn’t), the children’s bathroom would be reachable.
The bedroom is not a passage room. No one (regularly) has business there except the parents. The on-suite bathroom does not make the bedroom a passage room any more than a walk-in closet connected to it would. (Ah, watch out, the fictional housekeeper might also want to put laundry there, abolish the walk-in closet!!!)
I’m okay with constructions as illustrations. But not when they become absurd, as in this case.