Indigenous model - is this still legal?

The infrastructure in the small commuter belt municipalities is not designed for a constant increase in the population through ever new housing developments. The "Reibach" is a one-time effect; the costs for the expansion and maintenance of the infrastructure, on the other hand, are permanent for the municipality. Many suitable plots of land are also not even in municipal ownership.

Exactly: to expand its sewage treatment plant for more inhabitants, etc., the town must first be able to afford it; the properties often do not belong to the public sector; development costs money and time and so on. Moreover, one can at most see the provision of living space itself as a public task, but not the increase in the proportion of home ownership. So if the municipality were active in affordable housing, the whining would hardly decrease – because it would not do so in the form of single-family residential plots.

Search Mal

Getting a building plot - and yet it slipped away again on SWR3

The local model was overturned by the court because of a formal error.