Indigenous model - is this still legal?

The state would have already achieved a lot if it had fulfilled its original task of reasonably connecting the country publicly. It would certainly have relieved the cities and diluted the housing problem through more attractive space.

There's definitely some truth to that! We live here in a nice, comparatively structurally strong rural corner. From August I will be working again and although my husband and I will then work in the same village, which is only about 10 km from our apartment (even less after moving into the house), we need two cars because buses only run every hour alternating in one and the other direction (so every 2 hours per direction) and we would even have to change buses... this leads to a far too unreliable, inflexible commute... therefore two cars (I also sometimes have to go to the next notable town and I don't even want to start with public transport there) So for city dwellers the area is certainly unattractive... we don't know it any other way

There is definitely some truth to that! We live here in a nice, comparatively well-structured rural corner. From August on, I will go back to work, and although my husband and I will then work in the same village and that is only about 10 km away from our apartment (even less after moving into the house), we need two cars because buses only run every other hour in one direction, alternating each hour (so every 2 hours per direction) and we would even have to change buses... this leads to a way too unreliable, inflexible commute... that's why two cars (I also sometimes have to go to the next significant town and I don't even want to start with public transportation for that)

But this (bus connection) has nothing to do with willingness to develop but with economic viability. For example, when buying the property, I made sure that I have a train connection to get to work if the car breaks down. Currently, I would not know how to get to work without a car because there are no public transport options leading out. This will also be relevant later for the children when they do an apprenticeship or similar.

...but not that someone will later complain when the land prices rise in the "Dorf" because suddenly, due to the good connection to public transportation, all the city dwellers want to move to the village

hmm we also have a regional stop here in the middle of nowhere - the stupid train is late 60% of the time and is also completely overpriced, but you can get to school or work with it if the car doesn’t want to cooperate.

The (bus connection) has nothing to do with development willingness, but with economic viability. For example, when I bought my property, I made sure that I had a train connection to get to work if the car breaks down. Currently, I would not know how to get to work without a car because there are no public transport options leading out. This is also relevant later for the children when they do an apprenticeship or something similar.

So I understood chand as meaning exactly what I meant: rural areas are too poorly connected with the cities and with each other and are therefore often unattractive as places to live, even though there would still be a lot of plot space possible (and often available).

: That sounds like Stuttgart... Then we are not far apart. I am looking between Schwäbisch Gmünd and the edge of the Alb. Since no average person can afford anything in Stuttgart anymore, they all come here because of the railway line. As a result, everything along the B29 with a train station is also no longer affordable.

Completely off, I live in Jena in Thuringia... but surely more than one city has this problem...