Strange discussion here. The only problem is in the minds. It is neither a special qualification or achievement to be 'local,' nor is it a crime to move somewhere else for whatever reasons. I also find the importance of clubs somewhat overrated. There are many forms of social coexistence, does it really have to be in the MGV Concordia or with the countrywomen? Sure, this island formation as partly described here is a negative extreme case, but it is also planned that way. The decision on the (price) design of the building area was certainly made by locals, and now they are paying the price. They want 1000€ per m² of field, but then of course not the silly Munich people... I think a certain dynamic is good for the places, there will always be some wear and tear (mostly of the young) and some influx. Nothing stays the same forever, change is part of it and is good. I also don’t find the huts used as weekend houses at so dramatic. There are really worse things than neighbors who are never there. Regarding the actual topic, I find local models quite okay, but I am also of the opinion that those who do not completely exclude outsiders, but disadvantage them in price or chronologically, are the better ones.