Well, we agree that one should always have good reserves. You don't finance a house on the edge. But that also means if you really want a house, it often has to become cheaper – especially where land is expensive.
I can't understand the excitement at all. This is a very small plot of land on which a very small house stands. Fits perfectly! What else would you build there? A tower? Designer townhouse? That's nonsense. Just because the house is built cheaply doesn't necessarily show from the outside. I would say, no one notices that.
I can't understand the excitement at all. This is a very small piece of land on which a very small house is built. Fits perfectly! What else should one build there? A tower? Designer city house? That's nonsense. The fact that the house is built cheaply is not necessarily visible from the outside. I dare say, no one notices.
I think you didn't understand the thread! Because the land is expensive and there is hardly any budget left for the house, it will be cheap. So out of necessity! If there were a bigger budget, the house and/or the land would also be more lavish. And that's why I refer to the other thread. When building gets tight, consider alternatives accordingly. Or where should the money come from for the unforeseeable? Additional financing is always expensive. And hardly any money is saved.
Maybe only small steps are being taken so that things don’t come to a head. Here, enough high-priced large houses have already been presented that were six-figure amounts over budget.
I rather have the impression that someone here knows what they can spend and wants to.