andimann
2022-03-31 15:33:41
- #1
Hello,
don’t be mad at me, a lot has already been said.
But I have to say it clearly again:
Nothing fits together at all! When I add up the areas, I get 280 sqm (120 upstairs and 160 downstairs) plus the garage parking area! How does the architect come up with 220 sqm?
And with 280 sqm there is only a measly 39 sqm living room and an 8 sqm kitchen area? Sorry, the kitchen in my last single apartment was bigger! And a 10 sqm bathroom? You usually have that in a 120 sqm terraced house. Yes, it’s enough, but not in a 280 sqm palace?!
11 sqm office, for two people working from home permanently? How can you work there?
The room layout and orientation would absolutely not be my thing, extremely inefficient. Basically the house consists only of hallway and garage with a few additional rooms.
Then a technical question about the extension/garage:
According to the drawing, it is completely within the thermal envelope. That means you will largely have the same building requirements there as in the "main building". Also, due to the connection to the main building, you will have the same ceiling heights and floor levels. (Side question: can you park a car on floating screed?!?!? Because you need that at all to have any thermal separation between living area and garage)
I would therefore seriously doubt your massively different cost calculations for main building and extension. On the contrary, the garage will be technically tricky and thus expensive.
Furthermore: are you aware that your design revives the good 70s tradition of the heated garage? What kind of door do you want to install there to even get it approved (keyword KFW 55)??
So completely independent of the room layout: I have serious doubts whether the design is even technically feasible to implement. And then you still have to get your heated garage approved.
Don’t be mad, but please go back to the drawing board once again and start completely over...
Best regards,
Andreas
don’t be mad at me, a lot has already been said.
But I have to say it clearly again:
Nothing fits together at all! When I add up the areas, I get 280 sqm (120 upstairs and 160 downstairs) plus the garage parking area! How does the architect come up with 220 sqm?
And with 280 sqm there is only a measly 39 sqm living room and an 8 sqm kitchen area? Sorry, the kitchen in my last single apartment was bigger! And a 10 sqm bathroom? You usually have that in a 120 sqm terraced house. Yes, it’s enough, but not in a 280 sqm palace?!
11 sqm office, for two people working from home permanently? How can you work there?
The room layout and orientation would absolutely not be my thing, extremely inefficient. Basically the house consists only of hallway and garage with a few additional rooms.
Then a technical question about the extension/garage:
According to the drawing, it is completely within the thermal envelope. That means you will largely have the same building requirements there as in the "main building". Also, due to the connection to the main building, you will have the same ceiling heights and floor levels. (Side question: can you park a car on floating screed?!?!? Because you need that at all to have any thermal separation between living area and garage)
I would therefore seriously doubt your massively different cost calculations for main building and extension. On the contrary, the garage will be technically tricky and thus expensive.
Furthermore: are you aware that your design revives the good 70s tradition of the heated garage? What kind of door do you want to install there to even get it approved (keyword KFW 55)??
So completely independent of the room layout: I have serious doubts whether the design is even technically feasible to implement. And then you still have to get your heated garage approved.
Don’t be mad, but please go back to the drawing board once again and start completely over...
Best regards,
Andreas