Henrik0817123
2016-05-03 10:44:47
- #1
I don’t know where the rumor came from that besides our salaries we had to build up debt!? In fact, these are all loans from studies and also actually due to a wedding. The last loan was taken out 3 years ago. Since then, we have been paying off about 700 euros in loans per month, living as we live, and still have about 1,000 - 1,500 left over. And we have spent that money on things like vacations, because the plan so far was to pay off the loans as they are paid off but not necessarily make special repayments. So far, the desire for a house wasn’t as strong as it is now.
Also, one should read my very first sentence in the first post again... we are planning in the coming months/years...
The 400k house was just an example! That is exactly what it’s about. Examples of what would currently be possible (obviously nothing), what would be possible if the debts are gone, and how that then changes when you build up equity...
I see the whole thing in multiple stages of options:
1. 150% loan, as things stand now because 100% house + x % ancillary construction costs + % debt
2. 120% loan, 100% house + x % ancillary construction costs, debts paid off
3. 100% loan, 100% house, debts paid off and equity for ancillary construction costs
4. 90% loan, even more equity
The % are just examples now, but presumably everyone understands what I mean. Then the question is how much money can be put aside so that you reach options 2, 3, and 4. As unrealistic as 1 is in terms of reason and feasibility, we also won’t get to 4, not in a timeframe that suits us, since a more expensive house obviously also has a lot of ancillary construction costs budgeted, and that will already be a very big chunk.
What burdens me even more is the type of house, somehow everything is bad:
1. Old house, it should be clear what is bad about that
2. Prefabricated house, many potential problems and uncertainty of costs, e.g. basement excavations etc., something can always happen there
3. New build, basically identical to prefabricated house in terms of uncertainty, just a different method
4. An existing house but not old - these are probably the most desirable and therefore also the most expensive...
Also, one should read my very first sentence in the first post again... we are planning in the coming months/years...
The 400k house was just an example! That is exactly what it’s about. Examples of what would currently be possible (obviously nothing), what would be possible if the debts are gone, and how that then changes when you build up equity...
I see the whole thing in multiple stages of options:
1. 150% loan, as things stand now because 100% house + x % ancillary construction costs + % debt
2. 120% loan, 100% house + x % ancillary construction costs, debts paid off
3. 100% loan, 100% house, debts paid off and equity for ancillary construction costs
4. 90% loan, even more equity
The % are just examples now, but presumably everyone understands what I mean. Then the question is how much money can be put aside so that you reach options 2, 3, and 4. As unrealistic as 1 is in terms of reason and feasibility, we also won’t get to 4, not in a timeframe that suits us, since a more expensive house obviously also has a lot of ancillary construction costs budgeted, and that will already be a very big chunk.
What burdens me even more is the type of house, somehow everything is bad:
1. Old house, it should be clear what is bad about that
2. Prefabricated house, many potential problems and uncertainty of costs, e.g. basement excavations etc., something can always happen there
3. New build, basically identical to prefabricated house in terms of uncertainty, just a different method
4. An existing house but not old - these are probably the most desirable and therefore also the most expensive...