Floor plan single-family house city villa approx. 240m² without basement

I find this difficult because the changes are, to put it mildly, "not very obvious," meaning that when I am presented with "new" floor plans as "spot the difference" pictures – that is, without subtle hints as to where the main changes are – my hunter's instinct is not strong enough to discover them. So I see "nothing" (except that there was no recognizable relaunch: the floor plans still indicate that they were apparently not developed top-down).

Sorry, there was no complete relaunch either but, as mentioned, an adjustment based on the specific ideas from Würfel* that we really like. I would simply have liked to ask for feedback on that. Of course, if you are of the opinion that the floor plan is generally not sensible, then feedback on the adjustment also makes little sense. For now, we are quite satisfied with the basic design but still hope for suggestions/ideas for optimization.

I no longer have the thread history in my head, so apologies if this question is repeated: what added value do you expect from the door between the garage and the cloakroom? I generally view these access points critically, as they are often portrayed as necessary by builders out of convenience, but I do see a benefit if there is direct access to supplies and significant detours are avoided. Here, I see neither. The "detour" to the hallway without this door from the garage is probably about two meters, and in my opinion, the added value of the gained floor space for the cloakroom is clearly not outweighed by that.

If, of course, you think that the floor plan is generally not sensible, then feedback on adjustments also makes little sense. For the moment, we are quite satisfied with the basic design

No, I don’t find anything "generally not sensible" about the floor plan – large essential differences compared to a house for me or for are objectively not negative points in themselves – and thus your satisfaction is probably not "out of place" either ;-) Only, secondly, I lack an overview for quick recognition of the changed points for feedback, and first, I had already noted (and do not see this addressed) that the concept (I’d say "rich in tricky detailed connections") will cause stomach aches (or at least a smoking head) for the structural engineer and reasons for thorough inspection by the expert, I did not include the R.Hotzenplotz story in the considerations for nothing (and still find it worthwhile for you to read).

I find it much more pleasing now. Ok, the exterior view is not my taste, just like the mushroom head, but it doesn’t have to please me.
Regarding the floor plan:
finally some light is coming into the place! But it’s mixed up according to my room usage: the kitchen will be dark, the sofa and chill area get the south window, which will only be used in winter. The hidden and narrow pantry is also not my thing. However, many things are better now.
The toilet on the ground floor is right by the door. 1.50 m width is not enough there. I would swap the toilet and the washbasin.
The shower bathroom upstairs is also poorly furnished. It should be about 2 meters larger, for example, the shower in the windowless corner, turn the toilet so daylight can still reach the washbasin.
The door to the all-purpose room should be placed centered to the stairs, otherwise the sightline towards the stairs looks unsuccessful.
Regarding the garage/wardrobe door:
I promise you, the floor of the storage room will be littered with shoes. It’s not usable as a passage room in a household with children. Just yesterday at Hausbauhelden I once again heard that they prefer to go via the covered front and front door rather than through the ugly steel door. Without a door the room can be furnished and used better.
Edit/P.s. I did not compare it with the original on the monitor because I still have the design with the kitchen annex and dark all-purpose room very clearly in mind ;)

I don't really have the thread history in mind anymore, so apologies if this question is repetitive: what added value do you expect from the door between garage and cloakroom? I generally view such accesses critically, as they are often justified by builders out of necessity, but I do see a benefit if there is direct access to supplies and significant detours are avoided. Here, I see neither. The "detour" to the hallway without this door from the garage is probably about two meters, and in my opinion, the added space gained for the cloakroom is clearly not outweighed by that.

Thank you very much for your input! We decided on it because with small children it is very practical to get to/from the car. Also, the storage room behind the garage is a basement substitute, and here it is very convenient not to have to go outside to get something. We only lose the door here, and that is worth it to us.

Thank you very much for your input! We decided on it because it is very practical with small children to/from the car. Also, the storage room behind the garage is a substitute for a basement, and here it is very convenient not to have to go outside to fetch something. We only lose the door here, which is worth it to us.

Okay, it’s your decision, I just see it completely differently. And I hadn’t even considered the great practical point from

I promise you that the floor of the room will be covered with shoes. Not usable as a passageway in a household with children.

From my point of view, this turns even from "no significant advantage" into "often annoying or at least inconvenient condition" to walk through there. Especially since the path around outside is even covered.