Floor plan single-family house, ~180m², basement with gable roof

I thought the knee wall was set relatively low in the development plan. ?

Knee wall:
Valley side: Permitted up to 0.50 m measured from the top edge of the raw ceiling to the top edge of the purlin;
Mountain side: Permitted up to 0.75 m measured from the top edge of the raw ceiling to the top edge of the purlin.

According to the planner, this works via the attic.
I'll ask again just to be sure.

If the upper floor (i.e., parent/child) is a full story and the knee wall then only reduces in the attic, you don't have a 2m line on the upper floor ... or how is that to be understood?

That would be exactly the case, yes. But as I said, I want a setback to the terrace and we have to see how far down we can/may go - because a setback at 5 m height makes no sense.

So what now?
I think:
Basement
Ground floor
Upper floor
Attic ... with the knee wall

Now you are expressing yourself again as if the upper floor must have the knee wall, then the views still don't add up.

What kind of planner is this who cannot explain that clearly?

And as I said, I still don't see a hillside solution.

Heights: from the top left of the plan to the right of the plans there is more than 350cm difference: this is not taken into account at all in the plan. The ground floor would actually sink into the earth. If you have the garage height on the ground floor at the front, then the terrace would be on the upper floor at the back. Or am I mistaken? Your re-planning does not work like this - I would say. I have already said something about the floor plan, the kitchen is for people who do not have to work in it.

:
So, I'm building for the first time, okay?

I said regarding this topic:

I'm not an expert, but two full stories are allowed to be built. The question is whether we have to build them.
We would like a covered outdoor seating area, and it would be unfavorable if the roof hovered 5 m above it. Therefore, my approach would be to lower the roof as far as makes sense and is permitted. The issue is still a bit unresolved but hopefully will be clarified today.

So, that's the first thing...
And secondly, there was the building expert who asked about the "relatively low knee wall."
My answer was that this will be solved via the attic. By the way, neighbors did the same with the same construction company.
Where do you see a contradiction on my part?

Here, the upper floor is neither a full floor nor do the 50/75 cm knee wall rules apply, as far as can be seen.

Number of floors: 2
Roof type: Gable roof - Sichdachtstuhl
Roof pitch: 15-30 degrees
Style: Family house, country house
Orientation: North-South (planned)
Maximum setback on property: 0.75 m
Maximum projection on property: 0.75 m
Knee wall:
Valley side: Permissible up to 0.50 m measured from top of raw ceiling to top of purlin;
Mountain side: Permissible up to 0.75 m measured from top of raw ceiling to top of purlin.

There is also no 2-meter line marked on the upper floor plan, but there should be one with the current roof shape.

And, as I already wrote, the house shows no solution for your sloped property. Ypg has also noticed that.

Have another look at . ... By the way, I have never built before