Floor plan single-family house - Your assessment

For a budget of 300,000 euros, we don’t need to discuss the floor plan.
Rule of thumb: 2,000 euros per sqm + ancillary construction costs + possibly higher fittings - own work

Basement gone
Study on the ground floor gone
Children’s room smaller
Open space gone
Dressing room or sewing room gone

Floor plans with dimensions
Furniture always to scale
Draw the two-meter line in the upper floor

the country house 142 modern from Town & Country is approximately what fits your budget

I can only agree with the previous posters!

Don't get your "rose-colored glasses" hopes up for a house if it then fails due to cost planning.

We are also building in a region that is not yet so expensive and will only reach your set budget for the house itself, without a basement. And that still does not include a kitchen, floors installed, or paint on the walls.

Conclusion: find out the actual costs once again and then discuss the floor plan.

Thank you for the lively interest.

The idea seems familiar to me.

Yes, some time ago I tried my luck in another forum. Since then, the floor plan on the ground floor and basement has changed significantly due to criticism.

There are partial basements that at least save significantly less than expected - this one saves at least nothing, if it does not even become more expensive than a full basement.

According to a preliminary discussion with a BU, there is this almost 30m² prefabricated basement, which also resists pressing water and is Kfw 40 compliant (may one mention brands here?), for 20,000 including earthworks (assuming normal soil) excluding stairs. This seemed cheap to me compared to a HAR with 10m² in an insulated shell, which costs about the same.

: Apart from

When you reach the upper floor, you get a counter-rotating dizziness.

I could not find any concrete criticism now, so I assume that you generally dislike everything about my floor plan.

Smaller office so that the living room might become a bit cozier.

Is the living room too cramped for your taste?

Furniture always to scale
Draw two-meter line in the upper floor

Both are present.

Country house 142 modern by Town & Country is approximately what fits your budget

Thanks, I don’t dislike that much.

The 300,000 are probably really somewhat low/naive. That is also more or less the sum we had hoped for :\
It is a pity that most posts focused on the costs instead of the details of the floor plan. We would spend more if necessary, which is why I first stick to the floor plan. The background is also that I hoped to be able to get offers from a larger number of providers. Otherwise, you would probably enter negotiations/planning with two or three providers and then decide. But maybe that’s just how it is.

Nevertheless, I would be grateful for further criticism of the floor plan
Maybe someone can also help me with the initially described problem:

With only one full storey and 1.64m knee wall and resulting 18° roof pitch, we would have no usable attic :\[

With some hip roofs, I have observed that they first become flatter and then suddenly steeper. Is that perhaps exactly the solution? Starting with a relatively high knee wall with a flat pitch and at the point where you are allowed to reach 2.2m (Lower Saxony building code), becoming steeper to enlarge the attic. Would that be compatible with the development plan:

[...] only pitched roofs with roof pitches of 18 -48 degrees are permitted. Barrel and (half-) arch roofs are not permitted. Shed roofs are only permitted if they are constructed as double-sided roofs sloping in different directions. Offset roof surfaces are permitted.

Many thanks again to everyone who can still be a little patient with me.

Yes, some time ago I tried my luck in another forum. Since then, the floor plan on the ground floor and basement has changed significantly due to criticism.

In my eyes, very much has stayed the same, so I immediately had memories of the first attempt. All these offsets in the interior walls: I wonder how you’re supposed to properly lay the ceiling parts there. The entrance to the open space, which actually doesn’t even exist, only results from a faulty Tetris, doesn’t create a nice spatial feeling.

The windows above reach about up to 220 room height. Therefore, none of your windows work, because they all lie in the 2-meter range.

which is why I am sticking to the floor plan for now.

You shouldn’t stick to it. Standard houses with a similar room program are buildable and functional. Even the captured utility room doesn’t make life easier. The space for the fridge blocks your paths. In the bedroom, I would rather give 20 cm more on the left and right of the bed and rather give up the walk-in closet. And who needs a 16 sqm office, and then only a little sewing room of just 8 sqm? That’s basically 24 sqm nice to have, just badly allocated. The basement consists almost only of stairs. A 10 sqm level extension with daylight is much more valuable than such a dark room. The supply first has to find its way upstairs. By the time hot water reaches the top, you are done brushing your teeth.

Is the living room too narrow to your taste?

Yes, and quite uncomfortable with the couch in the room and actually already noses at the TV.

Have a look around the internet for floor plans.

I have observed that some hip roofs first slope gently and then suddenly become steeper.

Cost drivers. Focus on straight lines and simple construction.

Except for [Im OG angekommen, hat man einen gegenläufig gewickelten Drehwurm.], I couldn’t detect any concrete criticism, so I assume you generally dislike everything about my floor plan. [...] Thanks, I don’t dislike the [Landhaus 142 modern von Town & Country] that much. [...] Nevertheless, I would be grateful for further critiques of the floor plan. Maybe someone can also help me with the initially described problem: [Mit nur 1 Vollgeschoss und 1,64m Kniestock und daraus resultierenden 18° Dachneigung hätten wir keinen nutzbaren Dachboden]. With some hip roofs I have observed that they first run flatter and then suddenly steeper. Could that perhaps be exactly the solution? Starting with a relatively high knee wall with a shallow pitch, and from the point where you are allowed to reach 2.2 m (Lower Saxony building code), becoming steeper to enlarge the attic. [und an anderer Stelle: Es soll ein ganz bestimmter Fertigkeller sein, der laut Bauonkel effektiv nur ca. 25 TEUR kostet und gut gedämmt ist. Den gibt es nur mit diesen Maßen.] [...] Many thanks again to everyone who can still bear with me a little.

I am happy to be patient with you – so far, you haven’t done anything to argue against that. That I would “generally dislike” your design would be a misleading view. It is simply that to a more or less experienced building project reader it quickly becomes clear that you may be able to bake the most divine chocolate cake ever, but you understand even less about house planning than I do about soccer (and consequently the friendliest advice I can give you is to consult experts in such matters). If you don’t dislike the Landhaus 142 that much, then why don’t you take this model as a starting point to tell us concretely what you would like to vary about it. I don’t follow why you want to combine exactly 1.64 m knee wall and the minimum permissible roof pitch of your development plan – but yes: not only as an attic, but also for the living roof floor underneath, this results only in space that could be described as “more dead than alive” in the most flowery way: you really can’t do anything with that. How your wondrous hip roof with progressive roof pitch is supposed to be constructed, I don’t understand – maybe you can draw it once? The description sounds a bit like hip roofs with dormers as about 90 years ago (but their pitch did not increase from 22 degrees). Why hip roof at all and not gable, which is more space- and cost-efficient? It seems to me that you harbor no less than a dozen Eureka hopes in your mind at once, but at the same time, these thoughts are understood by no one except yourself, including highly experienced forum users like Yvonne and myself. @ all: can anyone here “translate” what the OP’s thought process is (or give a tip what I would have to smoke to find it convincing myself)? I would gladly help if I could just get a grasp on it at all...