11ant
2023-07-19 20:57:37
- #1
The OP had an absolute blockhead as an architect, who removed a shortcoming in one corner with every design adjustment but inserted one in another corner instead. How he managed to get rid of him for a plot tied to a contractor, I don’t know, but it was definitely a relief. Now he has a new architect, with whom changes finally also mean a net gain. However, that doesn’t change the fact that an approximation to 91% of the optimum has already been achieved. Trying to push it to 92% now would be foolish according to Pareto. I hardly see any more giant leaps like in recent weeks coming here, and one shouldn’t alienate the new architect by taking an example from Princess or Ilsebill Fischer. Keeping an eye on what is feasible does no harm.Your constant whining that it should be enough by now is a bit annoying. The OP is here specifically to perfect his floor plan. If it takes you too long, you can shine with advice and support elsewhere in the meantime.