Architects / Civil Engineer Service, Execution Plan, Scope

  • Erstellt am 2018-07-10 10:36:28

Kalle88

2018-07-10 11:44:31
  • #1
An implementation plan is simply too expensive. At least €20,000 is required. I would prefer the cheap solution. I want to have the building application and all necessary documents processed through the architect and civil engineer. I would also order a few detailed plans for that. What would you recommend to me? Which detailed planning should not be omitted?

Best regards
 

Lumpi_LE

2018-07-10 11:49:04
  • #2
Whether you pay the 20,000 to the architect/construction engineer now or later to the construction companies doesn't really matter. The money doesn't just disappear. It might be a bit cheaper, but you always read the nicest things here in the forum when there is no architect planning. Everyone as they wish, a house doesn't cost anything, so you can hope on a whim that it somehow works out in the end.
 

Zaba12

2018-07-10 14:06:13
  • #3
You can only do something like that if the contracted companies (from civil engineering to finishing) have known each other for years, work together, have a good reputation, and are located within a few kilometers.

We proceed just as you intend. However, my construction coordinator has built numerous investment properties with my contracted companies and is currently building a house for his daughter with them. He either went to school with all the owners of the trades or is related to them.

With tradesmen who don't know each other, I wouldn’t even try such an adventure. Everyone just passes the buck to the other trade.
 

Zaba12

2018-07-10 14:12:43
  • #4
Such an execution plan is not a masterpiece either! You just need an "economical" & easy-to-understand construction method that all trades can manage. What do you think an architect does when calculating the parapet height??? He subtracts the ceiling, the roller shutter box, and the window + 4-6 cm and bam, you have your parapet height, no rocket science at all. Direction of door + window opening, socket, switch, etc. all no witchcraft.
 

Kalle88

2018-07-10 14:58:18
  • #5


It’s clear that it’s better to have everything done by the architect. Everything comes from one source. But cost-wise it’s simply not feasible for me, especially since I know a bunch of craftsmen. I just have to make something out of it.
 

Kalle88

2018-07-10 15:46:55
  • #6


What did you have the architect create in terms of drawings? I mean, which detailed plans besides the documents required for the building permit.
 

Similar topics
19.03.2013Turnkey or build with architects?19
21.08.2014Construction costs when building with architects. What does your experience say?18
23.09.2015Responsibilities of the Architect in Tendering18
29.10.2015Is it normal for the purchase of land to be tied to an architect?16
19.01.2016Construction project with architects31
10.03.2017Payment of the architect16
19.05.2018Floor plan of new single-family house: Are window/door/interior wall size/arrangement okay?20
17.12.2018What is set in stone in the building permit application?10
05.08.2020Building a garden shed... Is a building permit necessary? Detours?17
25.09.2024Architect search Munich + surrounding area (recommendations?)15
15.11.2021Wishlist for the architect32
06.01.2022Problems with architects - approval procedures18
18.01.2023Architect performance phase 1-4 - Which documents are required?33
10.07.2022Bathroom planning 14m², new build, square, two windows70
24.05.2023Install a window afterwards?25
23.01.2025Energetic House Renovation: Is it sensible to involve an architect?13

Oben