Evaluation floor plan approx. 145 sqm single-family house basement/ground floor/upper floor

  • Erstellt am 2021-10-14 12:44:47

Climbee

2021-10-19 13:43:48
  • #1
*laughs* They said the same thing here, and those who showed us their wonderful view back then, which supposedly would never ever be built on because that’s not how the municipality plans it, now live in rows 5 or 7 with a view of the neighbor's house. That’s not a big deal – most houses don’t have a panoramic view. I just want to say: enjoy it while you have it, but I wouldn’t base the planning solely on that. It should also still work if the municipality changes its mind about further building land.
 

11ant

2021-10-19 13:57:15
  • #2
Alone just because of the "Geldbörserl" (in memoriam to Kurt & Trude with fresh cream on top) :)
 

Arango18

2021-10-19 14:41:16
  • #3


Well, I can’t say what will happen in 20 years.
But it’s very certain up to a time frame of that scale, because we had been looking for a plot for a while and only got this one because a buddy of mine got cold feet. So we had already checked things out firsthand beforehand (especially since my girlfriend works in the real estate department at our municipality :) )
 

Arango18

2021-10-19 14:42:18
  • #4
To the rest: Thank you for your numerous contributions and all is well - I take criticism in stride ;-) The tone makes the music after all and everything here is absolutely within bounds.
 

hanghaus2000

2021-10-19 15:11:52
  • #5
I can only agree here . Do something with the property.

Also something from the internet from me.
 

hampshire

2021-10-19 16:06:09
  • #6

For that, he would also have to look uphill over the balustrade.

As soon as you stop taking TV so seriously, that will work wonderfully.

Sure you can, it just costs extra and should be taken into account during terrain modeling at the same time.

Totally agree. Our house became five-figure more expensive due to soil class 7. But we were warned, the case was budgeted for.

There are two kinds of planning past the property. One financial (which is partly the case here) and one aesthetic (which I do not consider given in this case). I am sure that the living and usable space can be realized more cheaply on the property—if one wants to.
We built absolutely aesthetically and regarding our living comfort with the property and at the same time not at all focused on price per square meter—on two levels, ground-level with one side into the mountain and one side projecting outward. The fence on the left side shows the 27° north-south slope at this point. The west-east slope was a moderate 10° at the start of construction.
The question is always the one of the goal.
 

Similar topics
17.04.2016Value of land and bungalow B5511
08.11.2010Offer for a semi-detached house with land, okay?11
07.07.2011Financing land now, house in 6 months?17
09.04.2014Questions/neglected plot/meadow, determining construction measures44
31.08.2016What slope is still comfortable?12
23.10.2016Secure the property17
21.11.2016Misplanning Bavaria - slope towards house and garage - instead of away23
26.04.2018Plot on a slope, height difference approx. 4 meters12
07.01.2019House with slab foundation on a slope52
10.09.2020Construction project on a plot with a slight slope24
15.01.2021Development costs for a plot in the second row35
18.02.2023Floor plan - plot for a single-family house, slight slope approx. 175m²67
02.08.2023Plot of land with a slight slope14
30.08.2023Preparing the site for the floor slab on a slight slope15
17.10.2023Floor plan design single-family house 160 sqm, narrow plot12
17.03.2024House planning with 3 children's rooms on a 473 sqm plot31
17.09.2024New development area - sloping plot19
27.08.2024House placement - narrow - long plot17
01.10.2024Is the plot suitable for a narrow house for 5 people?43
26.02.2025Is reserved land reasonably buildable?16

Oben