When it comes to finances, I am out, except for the note: the bank has to want to! And it usually doesn’t want to with a sole earner. Exceptions: very high salary of the sole earner, a lot of equity, etc. The bank assesses the current situation and not what could be. This means: ONE income currently for you.
Does the 3rd child really make a difference?
Yes, you still can’t work full-time.
We will evaluate a few more options and also reassess the renovation needs in detail.
With a construction year of 1965, I see less of a renovation and more of a refurbishment. Almost everything has to be new: insulation, possibly windows and electrical systems.
Then there are the OPTIONAL costs, including floor coverings, kitchen, and new sanitary installations.
The latter might be 40-50 thousand, even with subsidy, but the former is rather six-figure or with a lot of exhausting subsidy after work and on weekends. Would you both want and be able to manage this for half a year, possibly with parallel costs for repayment and rent?
And I bet the current owner also knows about the refurbishment. Older houses don’t move currently; anyone who wants to sell their house deals with the regional possibilities and offers them as a premium.
In principle, I think the house number is also too big, better a smaller terraced house with manageable costs.
It’s often the case that one is tempted spontaneously and thoughtlessly by an “alleged bargain” instead of addressing the costs or house prices concretely and in the long term early on. Because then you know where you stand financially regionally.
Have you even been to a bank and asked about your limit? Do you know what houses usually cost in your area?