mayglow
2023-01-24 16:52:33
- #1
I personally see it the same way (we are currently buying a new-build semi-detached house from the developer), but it often isn't what people here in the forum imagine. Therefore, I didn’t want to push it on anyone who has different wishes. In principle, I think (also for ourselves personally) that the standard townhouse layouts fit many young families with 0-2 children well to very well and that the advantages outweigh the drawbacks.
Whether it fits the OP, I can’t say. The fact is, if you want 3 children's rooms and possibly an office, many standard townhouse floor plans probably don’t allow for that (exceptions prove the rule ;)).
Otherwise, just generally... when I joined this forum, there were sometimes standard reference values regarding financial feasibility. Depending on whom you ask, it might be something like "max 30-40% of net monthly income for the loan installment" or "max 100-110 times net monthly income for the loan amount." That doesn’t mean you can’t deviate from this sometimes, but you should then consider and justify it carefully for yourself. Tendentially, when interest rates were still low, people still had good buffers with the installment amount but often exceeded the total loan amount (sometimes significantly). Right now, it's rather the opposite (or with new builds, sometimes at the limit on both). People are looking for smaller properties or bring more equity, so the total loan amount can sometimes still work, but due to higher interest rates, their monthly burden still reaches its limits (it feels like all inquiries lately are in the range of "ouch, that really hurts" – I would classify our own financing the same way).
The OP exceeds both marks even when using the "prospective" income (including child benefits and the partner working part-time again factored in). I find that concerning and it tells me this is a number too big.
Whether it fits the OP, I can’t say. The fact is, if you want 3 children's rooms and possibly an office, many standard townhouse floor plans probably don’t allow for that (exceptions prove the rule ;)).
Otherwise, just generally... when I joined this forum, there were sometimes standard reference values regarding financial feasibility. Depending on whom you ask, it might be something like "max 30-40% of net monthly income for the loan installment" or "max 100-110 times net monthly income for the loan amount." That doesn’t mean you can’t deviate from this sometimes, but you should then consider and justify it carefully for yourself. Tendentially, when interest rates were still low, people still had good buffers with the installment amount but often exceeded the total loan amount (sometimes significantly). Right now, it's rather the opposite (or with new builds, sometimes at the limit on both). People are looking for smaller properties or bring more equity, so the total loan amount can sometimes still work, but due to higher interest rates, their monthly burden still reaches its limits (it feels like all inquiries lately are in the range of "ouch, that really hurts" – I would classify our own financing the same way).
The OP exceeds both marks even when using the "prospective" income (including child benefits and the partner working part-time again factored in). I find that concerning and it tells me this is a number too big.