Bertram100
2023-02-06 15:58:08
- #1
In the TE's position, the burden would be too high for me. Not because of the amounts, but because of the TE's attitude towards living. So many intermediate options (like a [R(M)H], for example) are not good enough. How is he supposed to cut back on luxury expenses if he can't even do so with the really obvious expenses like a single-family house, where one can truly live a bit more modestly without any sacrifice? How should he then be able to adjust the priorities of the financial situation in the long term?
I find the attitude more problematic than the numbers.
I find the attitude more problematic than the numbers.