Coalition Agreement 2025, New Building Funding

  • Erstellt am 2025-06-11 22:11:20
R

Rübe1

2025-06-13 08:50:38
  • #1
Reintroduce the old kw subsidy with a repayment grant, limited to 40+ (the photovoltaic requirement is also increasing and storage is now being given away). That would provide an incentive. Get rid of the QNG nonsense, it only makes things unnecessarily more expensive.
 
M

Musketier

2025-06-13 10:14:48
  • #2
From a climate protection perspective, promoting KFW 40 is complete nonsense. The difference in energy demand between KFW 55 and KFW 40 is marginal. What would be more important there is renovation, as significantly more effect can be achieved with considerably fewer resources.

For housing creation, of course, new construction and not renovation would be important.

Since resources are not unlimited, a decision will have to be made, and I completely agree with Nordanney that multi-story residential new construction and renovations should have priority.


Are there actually separate programs for housing cooperatives, or are they also included under the KFW programs?
 
N

nordanney

2025-06-13 10:19:48
  • #3
As far as I know, there are only loans for the purchase of cooperative shares, i.e. for private users who want to become members. Otherwise, the usual KfW funding applies - as it does for all housing companies and other commercial construction companies/property holders - which also applies to consumers.
 
W

wiltshire

2025-06-13 10:38:59
  • #4
What a divisive nonsense it is to create such groups and play them against each other in a polarizing way. Starting from Article 1 of the Basic Law, there is a mandate for politics to provide support to people who cannot help themselves, ensuring the inviolability of their dignity. This includes that people do not have to worry about having a roof over their heads, food, and participation in social life. We live (hopefully for a long time) in a social market economy. The market regulates prices but excludes all who cannot keep up. The "social" part has the task of ensuring that people do not fall so far that their dignity is compromised. Social housing is absolutely sensible if the goal is to take Article 1 of our Basic Law seriously. That it is politically possible to simultaneously promote other groups of people is a whole different matter.
 
H

HuppelHuppel

2025-06-13 11:14:53
  • #5


I don’t see that I am dividing anything. As long as it doesn’t concern me, they can carry out as much social housing as they want. But as a top taxpayer, I refuse to be squeezed more and more so that Jette, Kevin, and Justus can live in Berlin Mitte for €8. The fact is that the SPD floods Hartz IV recipients and low wage earners with rent subsidies, thereby destroying the entire wage structure in metropolitan areas. Social market economy is a nice term, but above all, the meaning of market economy is an eyesore to all left-wing parties. Rent control, housing benefit (plus), etc. have led us to where we stand today.
 
W

wiltshire

2025-06-13 11:24:31
  • #6
That sounds like you have somewhat isolated yourself from society. As a high earner, you are looking in the wrong direction. Compare the ratio of tax evasion to social costs. Ask yourself how fair it is that someone who earns the same gross income as you without working (capital gains) pays only 25% tax and minimal contributions? With your tax contribution, you are not paying for the comfort of people who have less, but subsidizing the growth of those who already live in abundance.

10 cookies are on the table. The strongest takes nine and leaves one for the second. The third goes empty-handed. Then the strong one says to the second: "Watch out! The third wants your cookie!" Now the strong one can eat in peace while the second and the third sit suspiciously facing each other.

You write like the second.
 

Similar topics
19.06.2009Evaluation of the KfW 60 House Contract: Credit Check for House12
10.05.2016KfW funding for two-family house26
10.12.2017Second residential unit in the house due to KfW funding 15313
18.11.2021KfW funding for KfW 40 Plus houses from now and from 01.07.202157
21.03.2021Land registry later than planned - save KfW funding18
20.10.2021Renovation of a 1960s house: Questionable expert recommendations?92
08.05.2021New building with granny flat - general contractor restricts rental and KfW funding51
31.08.2021Kfw 40 Plus funding - Ban on feed-in tariff?21
12.11.2021Exclusion of funding / Purchase contract signed before KFW grant10
06.12.2021House Purchase + Renovation - Which Strategy17
14.06.2022KfW BEG funding stopped 261, 262, 263, 264, 461, 463, 4641239
02.10.2025KfW Funding Climate-Friendly Residential Building from March 2023167
10.02.2023Combination of Bank & KFW Loan for Home Purchase and Renovation13
19.07.2023Double KFW 297 funding through two residential units?16
26.02.2024Energy renovation and extension, KFW 261 example51
03.09.2024New funding rates BAFA 2024 - also KfW?15
22.12.2024Old building - Purchase and renovation with KfW16
31.10.2024KFW 300 Funding - Attractiveness23
02.01.2025Cost estimate for renovating a 1970s semi-detached house according to KfW or BAFA38
11.01.2025KfW 300 funding upon disposal of real estate ownership10

Home financingHouse construction planning
Shell constructionInterior constructionRenewable energies
Building technologyExterior facilitiesFlooring
IKEA
Oben