Coalition Agreement 2025, New Building Funding

Sorry , I may or may not like your thematic point of view, but your choice of words actually speaks for a permanent "second place". Even if you were factually correct, reading your almost maliciously chosen words triggers a gag reflex because of these discriminatory remarks. Certain things simply can't be bought, like decency...... not even the tax rate changes that. You express yourself like supposedly those whom you humiliate - so you don't seem too far off, just a few percentage points. So tell me..... what's your first name, anyway? I'm old enough to know some scandal about that too.

Sorry your choice of words actually speaks for a permanent "second best".

When am I discriminating against him? Because I call "Bürgergeldempfänger" Hartzis?

Thank you for destroying the delicate seedling of a meaningful discussion. The internet has simply become unusable.

10 cookies are on the table. The strongest takes nine and leaves one cookie for the second. The third gets nothing. Then the strong one says to the second: "Watch out! The third wants your cookie!" Now the strong one can eat in peace while the second and third sit suspiciously facing each other. You write like the second.

So you think the "rich" are to blame for our collapsing social systems and the sluggish housing construction? I didn’t know, for example, that Ms. Klatten is plundering the statutory health insurance. How much do you want to take from the people?

I didn’t even know that, for example, Ms. Klatten is plundering the statutory health insurance.

She is not involved in the health insurance system at all. She is allowed to avoid it and possibly does so. I don’t blame her. Everything is legal. Systemically, however, it is wrong.

So in your opinion, are the "rich" to blame for our collapsing social systems and the sluggish housing construction?

You are a master of false conclusions – where do I write something like that? I speak of wrong framework conditions and do not accuse individuals.

How much do you want to take from the people?

I’m not “you” – I don’t put you in any corner either. And who takes from whom here becomes clear when the middle class also gets hit.

So you think the "rich" are to blame for our collapsing social systems and the sluggish housing construction? I didn't even know that, for example, Ms. Klatten is plundering the statutory health insurance. How much do you want to take away from the people?

The fact is, because the numbers are publicly available, that through legal tricks (Double Irish, etc.) and illegal tricks (Cum-Ex, etc.), which can only be done by the rich, every year more than a citizen's money for all recipients is shifted. But what are you upset about? Exactly. That’s what the cookie analogy is about. And now the serious follow-up question: If everyone had to follow exactly the same rules, from whom would what be taken away?