Building an end terraced house - Which technical requirements should be considered?

He does ask the joint applicants that (in my opinion technically absolutely correctly) as well. Announcement in the bulletin, done.

Let's be honest: most people simply don't care who they build with,

What do you do if the first person comes and says: "I’m building individually!"

Already placed an ad twice in the newsletter - no response received.

Exactly. Then I say "doesn't matter," i.e. I take the one for which the others in my row decide.

That possibility doesn't exist. He can only say "with X," then he can only be randomly assigned a plot that lies between/next to other "with X" builders; or "with Y," in the same manner; or "doesn't matter" (which increases his chances of allocation and he has the surprise whether it becomes an X or Y row).

I didn't mean that you should look for joint application partners in the Blättle. Rather, the mayor should write: Call to individual applicants to report afterwards with whom they want to build, so that the lottery can be supplemented by this information.

So once again my example: I want to build preferably on No. 10 and have said "doesn't matter" or "Huber." The applicants for 9, 11, and 12 want to build with Huber. Then it fits. Or I said "Meier." The applicant for 26 said "Meier," the applicants for 25 and 27 "doesn't matter." Now I get plot 28 in the row 25 to 28 that Meier is building.

So I wanted a middle house on 10. If I say "doesn't matter" or coincidentally (coordination doesn't work here because no one responds to my search ad) the same as the others in the row 9 to 12. If I say something else, I have to slip into a suitable other row and now build with my preferred provider, but an end house on 28.

The municipality has (for the individual applicants) in my example five lottery classes: for "doesn't matter / I join," for "Huber," "Meier," "Häberle," and "Pfleiderer." Häberle may be a prefabricated house provider for all I care—main thing, a row = one provider with jointly planning builders.

I didn’t mean that you should look for joint application partners in the Blättle. Rather, the mayor should write in: a call to individual applicants to report afterwards with whom they want to build, so that the lottery can be supplemented with this information

Good that we are in Germany; it’s not that easy here.

I am aware of a "similar" case; during the ongoing procedure they also tried to change the award criteria. The result of all this was, after a lot of legal wrangling, a reissue of the procedure after 1.5 years.

And when I look at the minutes from the TE municipal council meeting, their focus is anyway more on plots of land that are to be allocated for social housing

Good that we are in Germany; it’s not that easy here.