kati1337
2023-07-20 10:32:35
- #1
Yes, I still see the responsibility partly with the craftsman. If we had not been asked yesterday "how would you like the joints - or preferably no joints?", then I would have had no idea that I had to address/decide that. Our installer also said that creating it without joints is a bit more laborious. And he said that this is not advisable if there are strong differences in room temperature or humidity, since wood naturally works. But he also said that they had already done the seamless version in many houses, and so far nothing had ever happened.If that's true, then one is unlikely to have any success in receiving a "dislike" compensation here. It shows again how far the execution "rules of technology" is from a "nice" execution. From 1950, basically.
So, as always, communicate what you don't want and what you want/how it should look. A mindset of "I thought that..." remains and is always a pain in the ass. In my experience, it causes communication problems and laziness to want to make it nicer as a craftsman.
If you get a craftsman who simply does it according to the state of the art, no matter how it looks, that may be legally sound but certainly not in the customer's interest. As a customer, I would also be dissatisfied there. And for the craftsman, that leaves the unpleasant impression that he only does the bare minimum without much regard for how his "work" looks in the end.