grericht
2019-11-20 12:08:22
- #1
On the one hand, your window placements don't work because you need beams on the ground floor. They have to rest somewhere on the outer wall. But you have windows everywhere there...
On the other hand, take a look here: this is arranged much more sensibly since you don't create a bottleneck in the house or an installation that could be obstructive in the middle.
Thank you very much! I rebuilt your draft at my place. See attachment.
Has your described problem been resolved for all three drafts? I have no idea about statics, but the architect planned it like this initially?!
Proposal for the hallway from #108 revised again with regard to the dimensions:
![]()
If you have to, swap the WC and the 50 cm cabinet. I would find it better that way. But nobody can get around your self-imposed (curiosity) rules anyway.
For the new shoe obsession, one could possibly also put a windbreak/vestibule including a shoe cabinet as a subordinate component in front of the entrance. For that, you need the exact rules for "subordinate component" in your community.
Thank you very much! I have now also incorporated it again on my side. See attachment. As already mentioned, we absolutely want to prevent walking through the "shoe dirt area" with dirty shoes (except for my wife, we all walk barefoot). I believe this wish is not so curious but is also applied in other plans. We really won't let ourselves be dissuaded from that. We've also thought about a covered access. But I would prefer to keep that rather optional as a "roof only" in my mind and not want to concern myself with earthworks and foundations on that topic. It seems to work without it anyway.
There are now three possible drafts. One from the architect, one from ypg, and one from kaho674. Both new ones are much more straightforward but have the disadvantage that the wardrobe must be entered on the way to the WC. I think that's no problem because in both there is the possibility to park the dirty shoes beforehand. In short: I like both better than the previous one (which, by the way, was only developed that way because we formulated as a binding wish that the WC should not be accessed via the wardrobe).
I think I pushed both WCs "marginally" small. With ypg, the urinal fits better. The "extra wardrobe" with kaho674 can be incredibly useful but also can become very messy very quickly. I think I currently prefer ypg. There, the entrance door just doesn't quite line up under the window above (neither flush left nor right – this also applies to the one from kaho, where even more can be shifted).
All three variants could be open to the hallway or well separated by a wall and sliding door.