ypg
2025-01-04 19:21:44
- #1
When I read this here. .
Then I ask if you have ever understood in all the standard floor plan variants on the internet why this is done one way or the other.
It is after all the hallway that you enter first and it connects the most important functional areas. The staircase is centrally located to create privacy. The guest toilet is at the front entrance, to quickly get rid of urgent needs or wash your hands quickly. All of this is also advantageous during gardening. Where the guest room is located has to be found. Anyone who wants it differently would have to add 50 sqm to the 155 sqm and opt for an architect-designed house.
I’m not a fan of the staircase in the entrance area either. But it simply has its justification for cost-reduced construction. The statics in a gable roof house with the gable and roof beam arrangement dictate quite a bit. Any other arrangement would need to be recalculated and might involve additional follow-up costs for static reasons.
The knotted idea that it absolutely has to be done as others advocate or even propagate on social media is nonsense. Yes, even here in the forum there are approaches that are focused, I don’t exclude myself either, but as a basis you should first take a good look at the plot, budget, and possibilities before trying to reinvent the world.
What is not so ideal, you should not try desperately to make the square fit into the round, but instead try to also imagine advantages of what exists or what is new or different.
What do those with a terraced house facing north do? They make sure that the kitchen window at the front is somewhat larger and place two Adirondack chairs in the front garden. Otherwise, they are probably happier on their north-facing terrace during the day with the temperatures we have in summer.
Initial thought: There is a sufficiently large hillside plot facing north; for photovoltaics, the gable direction is basically set.
You accept that the children's rooms don’t get south-facing rooms, but they get the west side.
For those for whom controlled residential ventilation hurts, i.e. the costs, they should also think about cost optimization in other things.
With a sentence like
I don’t understand the thoughts: a garage is not a high-rise building, nor does the sun constantly stand in the same direction. So there won’t be any shadow areas, and if there are, they can be used, e.g., trash is better stored in the shade. The children may also not want to clean their bikes in the blazing sun.
The priority is clearly cost optimization of the driveway. I dare to say: a double garage is not cheap. Anyone who has to calculate should be okay with a carport.
If some feasible wishes are now incorporated, the house is almost planned.
Yes, without signature and contract they rarely calculate individual houses either. They have their factor per sqm. Added to that is the style, i.e., the facade height and the type of roof (these differ in price and feasibility). Possibly they check if the number of windows is manageable or if there are some factors on the wish list that drive the price up (e.g., an individual and thus expensive staircase. . , clinker brick, panoramic windows, etc.)
If it’s about cost optimization, then look for a solid builder or general contractor, take a suitable and solid standard draft from them and adapt it, possibly with length/shortening, possibly with a mirror of the house or rotation of one half or a plan square, adapt some other things, set an affordable highlight (e.g., a bay window, large window, built-in closet or whatever) and be happy with a reasonably built house.
Shower bath and stairs (if possible also guest room) should not be accessible through the dirty area in front of the front door
Then I ask if you have ever understood in all the standard floor plan variants on the internet why this is done one way or the other.
It is after all the hallway that you enter first and it connects the most important functional areas. The staircase is centrally located to create privacy. The guest toilet is at the front entrance, to quickly get rid of urgent needs or wash your hands quickly. All of this is also advantageous during gardening. Where the guest room is located has to be found. Anyone who wants it differently would have to add 50 sqm to the 155 sqm and opt for an architect-designed house.
I’m not a fan of the staircase in the entrance area either. But it simply has its justification for cost-reduced construction. The statics in a gable roof house with the gable and roof beam arrangement dictate quite a bit. Any other arrangement would need to be recalculated and might involve additional follow-up costs for static reasons.
The knotted idea that it absolutely has to be done as others advocate or even propagate on social media is nonsense. Yes, even here in the forum there are approaches that are focused, I don’t exclude myself either, but as a basis you should first take a good look at the plot, budget, and possibilities before trying to reinvent the world.
What is not so ideal, you should not try desperately to make the square fit into the round, but instead try to also imagine advantages of what exists or what is new or different.
What do those with a terraced house facing north do? They make sure that the kitchen window at the front is somewhat larger and place two Adirondack chairs in the front garden. Otherwise, they are probably happier on their north-facing terrace during the day with the temperatures we have in summer.
Initial thought: There is a sufficiently large hillside plot facing north; for photovoltaics, the gable direction is basically set.
You accept that the children's rooms don’t get south-facing rooms, but they get the west side.
Probably decentralized ventilation for cost reasons.
For those for whom controlled residential ventilation hurts, i.e. the costs, they should also think about cost optimization in other things.
With a sentence like
. . no shadow areas caused by the garage . .
I don’t understand the thoughts: a garage is not a high-rise building, nor does the sun constantly stand in the same direction. So there won’t be any shadow areas, and if there are, they can be used, e.g., trash is better stored in the shade. The children may also not want to clean their bikes in the blazing sun.
The priority is clearly cost optimization of the driveway. I dare to say: a double garage is not cheap. Anyone who has to calculate should be okay with a carport.
If some feasible wishes are now incorporated, the house is almost planned.
We were at three construction companies, partly received good plans (but too big) and partly standard drafts that did not fit at all.
With the optimized draft we want to approach construction companies and inquire with them.
Yes, without signature and contract they rarely calculate individual houses either. They have their factor per sqm. Added to that is the style, i.e., the facade height and the type of roof (these differ in price and feasibility). Possibly they check if the number of windows is manageable or if there are some factors on the wish list that drive the price up (e.g., an individual and thus expensive staircase. . , clinker brick, panoramic windows, etc.)
If it’s about cost optimization, then look for a solid builder or general contractor, take a suitable and solid standard draft from them and adapt it, possibly with length/shortening, possibly with a mirror of the house or rotation of one half or a plan square, adapt some other things, set an affordable highlight (e.g., a bay window, large window, built-in closet or whatever) and be happy with a reasonably built house.