Single-family house, 1.5 stories, 155 sqm

Here I only see the advantages of placing the wardrobes. Otherwise, I even find the sloping roof in the bedroom nice. Currently, we only have 1m – I find that too little. 1.4m I find great. But everyone has their own wishes and views.

These are exactly my views as well. But the city villa has done nothing to me, and therefore I do not avoid it either, when and where it better meets the requirements or simply "presents itself." By the way, very few development plans prescribe symmetrical gables or roofs with a central ridge, even though many torpedo the mansard roof, which is the one I find most appealing.

Thanks for the links, I simply don't find such gable roof houses very pretty. The proportions don’t fit.

I had specifically picked out two examples of successful proportions for you from eight years of forum reviews.

In my opinion, we need a fairly large area on the ground floor to accommodate everything. If we go for 2 living areas, we have to reduce the size downstairs in order to reach a total square meter count that is within the subsidy (max. 160 m² including proportional terrace) and within our budget. Then we get problems downstairs.

A normal family 2E2K can definitely be accommodated on 120 sqm without feeling cramped. If a subsidy limit of 160 sqm leads to rightsizing of Roman decadence, that does not make planning a torment by any means. What kind of rooms are those that so necessarily require a load distribution of more than sixty percent on the front axle? – after all, storage, technical and other non-living spaces are quite flexibly assignable, and also the KGB room group has quite a bit of fluidity potential; you just have to think slightly away from nailed-down room usage assignments. Many people have unnecessarily fixed door signs in mind when planning their own home.