Is financing possible with ING?

  • Erstellt am 2020-12-13 19:55:01

Janabalenciaga

2020-12-14 11:30:23
  • #1


I just pointed out the VAT to my husband, he said we contractually agreed that it is a fixed price and 16% remains. But of course we will check the contract again.
 

nordanney

2020-12-14 11:36:25
  • #2
LOL. Do you really think the company is willing to give away 3%? That is 20% of the planned profit. Comparable to a lottery win. At least in terms of probability. I don't know anyone who does that – at least the company is obliged to charge 19% VAT on the invoice next year. Fixed price – yes, but with the respective valid VAT, which is a pass-through item for the company.
 

halmi

2020-12-14 11:43:53
  • #3
The 16% cannot stay at all, your builder doesn't have control over it himself. And he certainly won't give you the difference as a gift.
 

Janabalenciaga

2020-12-14 11:45:14
  • #4
I’m not saying anything. It’s not my statement and not my wishful thinking. I just find it difficult and associated with immense effort to explain every single item to everyone and preferably provide proof. If I say it is so, then I haven’t made it up, but taken it from the contract! It’s very helpful when certain things are pointed out so we can double-check them… but phrases like “LOL” and “Do you really think so” are not helpful, rather time- and nerve-wracking. I believe what I see with my own eyes in the contract. Moreover: since I myself work in the advertising industry, I know exactly how little value marketing promises have, but the company also advertised with the VAT applicable at the time the contract was concluded (which doesn’t necessarily mean anything, but if it is stated in the contract as such?) In my opinion, this discussion need not take place, right?
 

halmi

2020-12-14 11:48:24
  • #5
What if next year the VAT is increased to 21% or even more? That is an incalculable risk for every company. The only thing he "guarantees" you is his net fixed price.

Sorry, you are pretty naive.
 

nordanney

2020-12-14 12:13:37
  • #6
What discussion is supposed to take place? You approach the matter naively and anyone who points out that there is a catch hidden there is labeled as unconstructive. If you think you know better because everything is in the contract, then you shouldn’t have asked for our opinion 13 pages ago. You want to build cheaper than everyone else here in the forum. And not even €50 per sqm, but between €500 and €1,000 per sqm. That would be like suddenly getting an S-Class at the price of a Golf. You’d ask about the catch there too. It is of course clear that you will only get the cheapest equipment. I mean cheap, not affordable. That’s not bad, you just have to be aware of it. And you shouldn’t fool yourself into thinking that the costs will stay that low. They can’t be maintained even when cheap.
 

Similar topics
16.06.2011Conclude a construction contract under reservation?10
13.09.2012Feeling pressured into a contract, is that normal?17
29.09.2011Is construction pre-planning without signature / contract legally valid?12
16.07.2012The builder "outsources" fixed-price services to subcontractors12
16.05.2015Contract unclear: humus earth collectors10
04.07.2016Building without a contract - Concerns?39
10.09.2016Construction financing and contract with the developer24
28.05.2017Plundering the Riester contract - for less need for credit?16
16.08.2018Civil engineering works without a contract - normal, experiences?10
21.05.2019Experiences with building an architect at a fixed price?30
06.06.2019Completion date in General Contractor Agreement - Wording assistance62
26.04.2021Turnkey fixed price during Corona or cost increase?43
09.05.2021Price adjustment clause in the contract with the general contractor18
21.09.2021What is the value of a fixed price that is not guaranteed?34

Oben