For that, the purchase price was different, reflecting your surroundings.
In fact, we were extremely lucky with the purchase price, and it was significantly below what was typical in the area. Now it has risen, but if one were fair, it would still have to be quite a bit higher. We live right in the city by the forest, all the daily madness facilities within walking distance. Only the main road running past us is no jewel now, and the railway line on my property. Similar plots at the other end of the city have double the value. So it really doesn't make much sense.
So either it is buildable or not allowed. How should both work? Did you file an objection?
With us, there is a distinction between whether it is buildable (meaning it could become building land if one wanted) and whether it is official building land.
I could go to the office and officially make building land out of my entire property. But according to the land register, the rear strip is garden land. So no "buildable land." I don't know if it is handled this way everywhere.
The funny thing was, when I called about it last week, they themselves were totally confused about why it was accounted for that way here. The left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing.