Does the real estate market increasingly force more families to build?

  • Erstellt am 2019-04-06 11:35:44

Nordlys

2019-04-18 14:26:11
  • #1
I don't understand why you can't simply deduct the mortgage interest for tax purposes like in Scandinavia. As a pension expense. You can claim every silly apron, every professional kilometer, every liability insurance, but not the house loan interest. Unless it's a rental property, then yes. Absurd. K.
 

chand1986

2019-04-18 14:35:24
  • #2
Fundamental agreement. The unequal treatment makes no sense.

However, I believe that the tax burden has been effectively shifted downwards for a long time anyway, thanks to bracket creep. I would rather advocate addressing this and eliminating this grievance. But then Lieschen Müller wouldn't have so much to deduct - whereas the high earner with the villa can really benefit.

It would be better to generally disallow interest deductions and instead significantly raise the tax allowances. That would also be better than all that Baukindergeld nonsense, just cosmetic surgery on a cancerous patient.
 

Thierse

2019-04-19 08:08:20
  • #3
The primary beneficiaries of the [Baukindergeld] are buyers of existing properties in rural areas. Tendenitally, it will likely lead to further rising construction costs, as construction companies will correspondingly try to enforce cost increases.

The challenge in building or buying a property for personal use for many families is that existing equity is tied up. Equity that would actually also make sense for later retirement provision, e.g., invested long-term in stocks and ETFs.

Very few home builders then have enough money left to reasonably provide for old age. And owning a house is nice, but rarely a truly suitable retirement provision, since a kind of second rent is always incurred.
 

Maria16

2019-04-19 08:53:36
  • #4
Yeah, Thierse, then we'll note for you that everything is stupid. Buying a house is stupid. Renting is stupid. So what would your solution be?
 

Thierse

2019-04-19 09:03:52
  • #5
Halving the real estate transfer tax, lowering energy standards for new buildings to an affordable level, more social housing, reintroduction of the old home ownership allowance and tax incentives for home ownership....
 

Maria16

2019-04-19 09:56:13
  • #6
No, I mean, what is YOUR solution. Not what others/the state should do for you. Because you will have to make a decision about something at some point, and under the prevailing conditions.
 

Similar topics
04.11.2009Taking a loan for equity financing?19
28.03.2011Can we afford to build a house without equity?14
20.07.2011House construction: Equity / incidental construction costs realistic?14
03.04.2012Buying a house without equity?29
30.04.2012No equity, good income, financing feasible?22
26.08.2012Small single-family house, little equity but good income, is it at all feasible?11
14.11.2012KfW loan as equity capital - Who knows this financing?10
19.03.2013General questions about equity and construction costs10
01.05.2013No equity / existing consumer loans / financing possible?11
20.06.2013Problems with equity - real estate purchase15
29.08.2013Calculate equity and financing12
27.02.2015Financing plan: high equity / 2.67% / 15 years / full repayment15
14.01.2014Different share/equity for construction. How to write it firmly?10
16.01.2014Problems with bank - equity10
27.05.2017Realistic or daydream? (Buying property without equity)95
27.03.2019Report: Building a house as retirement provision? No way!165
04.06.2020Is building a semi-detached house sensible despite low equity with a long loan term?79
02.06.2020How much reserve in addition to equity?20
02.01.2021Financing evaluation. Specify total equity to the bank?19
01.07.2021Financing / Equity / Granny Flat - Fundamental Thoughts48

Oben