Does the real estate market increasingly force more families to build?

  • Erstellt am 2019-04-06 11:35:44

Nordlys

2019-04-10 10:59:28
  • #1
Regarding the Energy Saving Ordinance. Of course, it is also a price driver, not the only one, but one: An energy calculation must be done: 1500,- Something renewable must be installed in the house: at least 4000,- for solar thermal, everything else is more expensive Everything must be sealed with plastic. Costs? Triple glazing is required. probably also 2000,- It is hardly possible to build monolithically anymore. Costs? And the Energy Saving Ordinance is nonsense in many ways... it is often neither ecologically nor economically effective and does not take into account the insulation costs, including the ecological insulation costs. K.
 

ypg

2019-04-10 11:07:31
  • #2


Not necessarily. The Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 is basically the former Kfw 70, and when we built our 70-house in 2013, the hype around triple glazing wasn't even there yet. So you could still do without it if you want to build according to today's Energy Saving Ordinance. But besides the saying "you only build once," there's also the saying "whoever builds Energy Saving Ordinance-compliant, i.e. minimum standard, ends up with an energetically old shack."
 

wurmwichtel

2019-04-10 11:09:11
  • #3
Maybe, but you don’t shoot sparrows with cannons anymore, you shoot mosquitoes.
We pay 55€ monthly for heating/hot water for our 130sqm.
What advantages would KfW55 and KfW40(+) have in that case?

480mm aerated concrete (PP1.6) should be sufficient for passive houses.
"I’m putting this in my Bonka!" *sing*
 

pffreestyler

2019-04-10 11:13:18
  • #4
@my statement above

No subsidy, but you are right about the own contribution, a lot was done independently. Of course, it distorts the comparison somewhat, but it does not make up for 100k or 2k net.
 

Nordlys

2019-04-10 11:29:01
  • #5
It was always like that, even in the 60s: ordinary people built the house themselves. [Siedlerbund]! Already forgotten? Yes, today something like that is almost forgotten, but in [SH] for example still alive.
 

ypg

2019-04-10 11:40:11
  • #6


That's the difference: modest hut with a small salary, who don't complain versus a salary around 6-7000 a month, "I want what every magazine shows in glossy" and complaining about real estate prices
 

Similar topics
29.04.2010Energy Saving Ordinance 2009 even without solar?16
07.06.2013Is it mandatory to build according to the Energy Saving Ordinance (2009)?12
23.10.2016Thermal insulation, Energy Saving Ordinance, KFW 70 / 55 / 40 - Your experiences31
19.06.2015Build according to KFW 70 or the Energy Saving Ordinance 201442
15.12.2019Aerated concrete exterior wall vs. Energy Saving Ordinance13
09.07.2015Energy Saving Ordinance Proof vs. Energy Saving Ordinance Proof + KfW-70 Proof13
19.10.2015New energy saving regulation from 2016 -> What to build?30
23.10.2015Energy Saving Ordinance 2014 - Gas boiler without solar?38
10.01.2017Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 / KFW55 / Gas + Solar in 201628
24.12.2015Single-family house, Energy Saving Ordinance 2016, developer recommends additional insulation - is it sensible?39
24.03.2016How can information such as the Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 be accessed?14
09.05.2016Compliance with the 2016 Energy Saving Ordinance with the following heating14
30.08.2016Construction and Performance Description - Contract including Energy Saving Ordinance 201415
11.02.2017KfW loan in 2017 for a house under the 2016 Energy Saving Ordinance17
23.02.2017New construction according to the 2016 Energy Saving Ordinance no longer possible without a ventilation/exhaust system?40
27.02.2017Difference between Energy Saving Ordinance 2014 and Energy Saving Ordinance 201612
14.04.2017House construction from concrete vs Energy Saving Ordinance 201631
19.07.2017How can one circumvent the Energy Saving Ordinance and avoid bureaucratic madness?161
16.07.2017Energy Saving Ordinance, KFW55, KFW40 or KFW40 Plus19

Oben