City villa floor plan - suggestions for changes?

At first glance, I notice that the living room, meaning the 3.70 x 3.x0, is not furnished to scale. A normal family sofa would have to be placed in the open area. However, that would be anything but cozy. You would then be sitting in the entrance corridor. Where can the square meters of the middle wing be found? The goal here is to zone and furnish it without doing without the middle and to see this wing as a spacious part of the house. However, everything in this corridor must also be used. I don’t believe that is what is intended.
Regarding the office/practice: I find our office with 14 sqm already very small for office work. I don’t think you realize what is not possible in under 11 sqm or what a room with 3 doors cannot do.
Here there is at least one door too many. Otherwise, I would swap the utility room and the toilet and close off the connection from the hallway to the main corridor with a door.
I personally find the granny flat too small for a couple in their mid-60s, but everyone has to know for themselves what they can manage with.
The dressing room is also almost unused. A shame for the expensive square meters. The same goes for the children's bathroom.
P.S. We also have the entrance hallway open and the corridor as a dining area. I wouldn’t do it again because it’s not exactly cozy there. For the dining area, thus an active space, it is still okay, but for a chill area I would think of something else.

The huge flat roof half greened and half as a roof terrace - I could imagine something extraordinary there. But you don't need it because the garden is big enough, right?

The kitchen is poorly furnished, so it is not to scale. The island cannot be like that.

I would also rather plan the living room so that the sofa stands in the niche and the TV then in the corner at the top of the plan.

The parent area is quite large at about 38 sqm but ultimately only offers about 5 m of closet space. I would plan the bed on the other side and the passage doors to the dressing room/bathroom rather to the right. Then the headboard is not next to the entrance door.

The door to the granny flat should open the other way.

Why are there 2 doors to the workroom? I would definitely save one. If the waiting area is in the intermediate building, then save the outside door.

What I don’t see at all is a proper wardrobe for a family of 4-5 people.

Well, I would say it is definitely an improvement over the initial draft. It's a pity that apparently not everything can be implemented with this company.

Basically, everything has already been said. In my opinion, only little of it has been implemented. In particular, the cloakrooms and storage spaces are much too tight with you. A large part of the main house’s cloakroom will end up with Child 3. I bet that the pointless door to the garden in the connecting building will be blocked with something within a short time. I wonder why this connecting building is still needed at all now? If you move the entrance of the extension to the front, the entire connecting building could be used for something else (by the way, it is roughly the size of the utility room). Or it can be dispensed with altogether. As it is, it’s just a pointless corridor – strange.

Since it is supposed to be like this anyway:
I would rotate all the bathroom equipment in the extension by one position, so that the washbasin is at the side of the shower. All the others move around accordingly.
I had also thought of a sliding door between the workroom and the entrance corridor in the main house, as Yvonne recommended, so that customers cannot look into the living house.

The senior extension is at least somewhat worsened - I do not want to misuse the big word "improved" here. Do alternative practitioners now mainly make house calls? - because the practice room seems very impractical to me, and the patients will probably use the bathroom in the appendix as often as the guest WC in the main house - if this is not desired, I do not yet see the approval readiness. The ensemble appears "crooked" to me, i.e. the extension visually like "without a roof." What is the deal with this "temporary property boundary" that cuts a wedge into the floor plan?

Dear all,

Please take a look. I think I've got it!
Technology room in the middle, I deliberately copied all the equipment in to illustrate to the responsible lady that it fits. Then I moved the entrance of the granny flat. I think this should be the best solution. It enlarges the practice and our living room and gives us a shower and a wardrobe.