reeneex
2016-05-23 10:04:44
- #1
You understood it correctly. The idea was to place the house about 5-6m away from the property boundary, to raise the ground in front of the house and under the garage (possibly using the space for a rainwater tank and burying it there), and to create the access to the office on the left side of the house as a winding staircase or curved path (so it doesn't get too steep). The garage should visually separate the property from the adjacent field, which is why it is set at an angle to the house. About 2m from the property boundary as seen from the lower corner. The children's room and bedroom would then have morning sun and would not heat up too much over the course of the day, but still catch sun in winter. Kitchen and living room face southwest, floor-to-ceiling windows that are not opened, a frameless sliding terrace door, and in the kitchen a door to the front where in winter a greenhouse is placed that is otherwise dismantled. Above the sink, a wide (2m) window that is not opened. This way, we would still have space to the left of the house for a path leading to the backyard, which would then be about half the size of the property. The total roof area currently about 235m², half facing southeast and southwest, which yields about 1142 kWh/m²a at this location. After 15 years the system would have paid for itself, without subsidies. With subsidies, after about 8.