ypg
2016-08-05 13:00:51
- #1
The bed is supposed to be in the bedroom (2m wide x 2.50 long) and 2 nightstands (40cm x 50cm) So we need bed + 2x 50cm wide, we have 3.10m and 2.50m + TV depth 30cm 2.80m long, we have 3.30m
You forget two/three things: 1. The person also needs space. 2. The craftsman takes your dimensions as raw building dimensions, so plaster will be added, and you won’t get your furniture in anymore. 3. You can’t place furniture tight against the wall. There always has to be some air (Air = cm).
Your bed therefore needs 200cm... a person about 80 cm on one side of the bed, that makes together 360cm, not 310. How you furnish the 80 on each side is up to you.
Your bed is 250, so it needs approx. 255 of space, the person about 80 cm plus TV cabinet 35cm = 370cm
The dressing room is for 2 dressers each 48cm deep and opposite wardrobe 62cm deep, makes 1.10m. We have 2.30m. So 1.20m as passage
...makes 110cm as a passage, which is defined as a slalom passage. If then someone has the wardrobe door open and stands there, the other person can no longer pass by at all.
There should be a continuous cabinet construction in there that holds all media devices including speakers. No windows on the side because of the dark room effect.
It’s not supposed to become a homebody.
...just like the parents?
We’re still thinking about using the big corner in the hallway for a small pantry.
Even more slalom???
The slanted wall in the utility room should give us a bit more space and since it’s in the basement the look is not so important. What else is bad about a slanted wall?
It costs more and your example clearly shows that an incompetent planner is at work here.
Sound transmission shouldn’t be a problem. It’s a single-family house, so no neighbors.
Family members also make noise.
These are all just ideas and drafts overall for the planner who is supposed to turn the whole thing into "buildable."
Then you should leave your "planning" at home! An architect knows how to handle a hillside property better.