House on parents' property - inheritance problems?

Well, the tax office should be able to say how it intends to calculate the inheritance tax in the event of inheritance. Until now, I assumed that it would be enough to simply remind them once again that I built and paid for the house myself. I will have to pay a lot of inheritance tax anyway, so it would be good if my house is not counted.

I find this view strange. Why should the tax office help you save on taxes? You "cheated" the tax office on the real estate transfer tax back then and now you want another discount by pointing out that in the case of inheritance you have to pay so much tax (= are rich)?

I find this view strange. Why should the tax office help you save taxes? You "cheated" the tax office on the real estate transfer tax back then and now want a discount by referring to the fact that you have to pay so much tax in the event of inheritance anyway (= you are rich)?

He wouldn’t have had to pay real estate transfer tax back then either; direct relatives are exempt from it. At most, the father would have had to tax a profit (if the property was somehow involved in agriculture or in a business asset), or the son would have had to pay gift tax; however, this is unlikely due to the allowances.

At that time, our main concern was actually just to save the division costs (surveying and notary). No one told us that then the house would not belong to me. Also, if I remember correctly, there would have been problems with the setback areas in the case of a division.

That will be difficult enough later anyway if I want to sell everything, because then the buyer would also have to buy the old house. And the area to be developed at the back of the front plot can only be used sensibly if the back plot serves as a garden. However, if the back plot is sold, the district office would use its right of first refusal 90 percent of the time to annex it to the surrounding green area. So this plot would have to be leased to the buyer of the front plot in the long term.

Back then, it was really only about saving the division costs (surveying and notary).

And what am I supposed to live on?

Also, if I remember correctly, there would have been problems with the setback areas in the case of a division.

If you had asked a colleague, you could have received several suggestions for solutions right away.
Without real division: At least co-owners in the land register, better ideal division according to WEG.
With real division: Setback area, access path and/or unification building encumbrance

of the front property... the rear property

So are there multiple properties?

However, in the event of a sale of the rear property, the district office would exercise its right of first refusal 90 percent of the time.

On what legal basis does this right of first refusal rest?
Besides, you don’t need to worry, because the municipality enters into the negotiated purchase contract.

Good day!

A few days ago, someone asked something here who is in a similar situation as I am

Matthias

Hello Matthias!
Greetings to Sebastian!

P.S. You are a great band!

since the initial situation is clear, there are only 3 possibilities. The house will be gifted to you up to 400000€ no problem, above that gift tax. The house will be sold to you, whereby you can manipulate the cash flow. The house will be transferred into a heritable building right. In all cases, a notary and a division of the property are needed