The patchwork brickwork problem is this: when the planner ignores the octameter module and invents fantasy measurements that do not align with the stone dimensions, then the mason must first saw bricks and secondly also gets "confused" by having to place the head joints of adjacent brick courses "not aligned" (ideally roughly centered over/under the stones of the neighboring course). The stability of the wall structure suffers, and not infrequently the window installer encounters anchoring problems in the open wounds of this mess. The cause is planners of the "CAD generation" with degenerated spatial imagination and no practical construction experience, who cannot imagine the walls they draw being built in their mental cinema. Whether this is because draftsmen and architects in my pencil era went to school before Pisa? – one does not know ... Anyway, it would actually be no magic to divide a meter into eight equal steps, and all parties involved in implementation would literally feel a weight lifted off their shoulders – the construction quality would improve by a whole league through this simple trick.
A window from the landing to the ceiling-wall junction
Apparently you know one more technical term than I do :) In any case, I played the Schäng Pütz and prepared something for you: in the drawing, the red lines represent the floors of the bathroom and stairwell; the blue arrows indicate the height of the railing according to the floor plan; the yellow arrow shows that the railing height rises by seven steps from the landing floor; the orange arrow is the 1.72 m tall stair user and the gray bar symbolizes the position of the floor slab. So, hopefully it becomes very clear what an unplasterable window is planned here. To avoid conflict with a ring beam, the stairwell window would probably be best positioned at about 130 cm above the landing floor. To avoid a Frankenstein-like slanting facade maybe you will choose the bathroom window more nicely than the bedroom window?