Floor plan of a single-family house with approximately 150 sqm on a rear lot

With a little "window change," the garden from draft #89 won't get any bigger, and due to the lack of a site plan, it seems that in #1 it wasn't even recognized that the neighbor's garage or the own carport darkens the living spaces.

That's exactly your problem. You simply can't accept that we have indeed recognized, discussed, and classified it as acceptable for us, since other things have a higher priority for us. Just because you don't want to understand that we have already thoroughly discussed it, on the property, on paper, etc. etc. etc., does not mean it hasn't taken place. By the way, it is quite presumptuous to believe that only you or the people you deem worthy are capable of recognizing the obvious just because you don't want to discuss every little detail with you. And now, let's get to the point, because unlike you, an amateur forum user, the draft from #89 was actually made by an architect who, of course, had the site in view. I just traced it. Yes, somehow I already expected such an arrogant comment because that's your style. If I weren't such a cheerful person, a lonely tear would now roll down my cheek out of pity.
But how glad are we that you remind us again that in a finite space, depending on the dimensions, there is a larger or smaller free area. Someone paid attention in elementary school. Brilliant! These fundamental things would have almost slipped past us and the architect. Thanks for that.

And no, if you really believe that your suggestions (which are now really found in abundance in similar form on the internet) would take into account what I tried to implement in a plan including all existing facts/problems, like the tree, the driveway, etc. etc. etc., then you simply have a problem with comprehending information. However, I have to admit that these are indeed quite scattered throughout the thread and therefore somewhat difficult to grasp.

But I will actually stay out of it here now and say goodbye with a bow.

Nobody who knows anything about it would keep fiddling with your drafts,

My note in post #2 is to be read as meaning that I also do not consider it urgently necessary. Both the linked draft and the one of the OP in the opening post are, in my view, so far above the Pareto threshold that they do not lower the quality average in terms of submission readiness. This of course only applies to the house; the driveway situation in my view, as presented, still presupposes the imminent invention of the right-angled steerable car. But a parking calculation is not required for the building application. As "someone who knows something about it," I merely pointed out that my professional profile also includes finding architects (and that one should consider addressing those of the neighbors).

That's exactly your problem. You simply can't accept that we have indeed recognized, discussed, and classified this as acceptable for us, since other things are prioritized higher for us.

The question here is always whether the priorities already exclude each other or not? As long as I still see alternatives that combine more wishes than before, I'll keep tinkering.

...the draft from 89 was actually made by an architect who of course had the site in mind.

The upper floor was never done by an architect; if it was, she wasted 4 years studying. The ground floor is such a banal standard that you can find it in any prefab house provider's catalog. But the real flaw was that YOU, YOU, and yet again YOU actually did not want to rotate the house to have a maximally large garden. But suddenly that's no longer important and any criticism of that is presumptuous?

And no, if you really believe that your suggestions (which can now really be found abundantly in a similar form on the internet) would take into account what I tried to implement in a plan including all existing facts/problems, like tree, driveway, etc. etc. etc., then you simply have a problem grasping information.

I have already asked the question, which of these facts you had named up to that point was not considered in #110? You have remained answerless on this.

I'm actually going to stay out of this now and say goodbye with a bow.

Why? I just got the popcorn out.