Building with GU - Offer from GU including design

  • Erstellt am 2015-01-29 13:54:22

ypg

2015-01-30 08:46:58
  • #1
No, the question from the OP is answered in a shortened way by telling him that as the builder he has the control function with his signature. That's it, end of story. Further answers become unnecessary. I don't discuss the location of the windows in a floor plan discussion either, if the staircase is already wrong!
 

ypg

2015-01-30 08:53:26
  • #2


I see absolutely no chance there! One can and will expect a client to constantly check the documents before the building application.
 

Tichu78

2015-01-30 08:56:13
  • #3
 

ypg

2015-01-30 08:59:12
  • #4
Me again, unfortunately pumped full of a ton of anesthetics (medically prescribed, mind you), I am now rereading the initial thread: many building contractors make offers based on their nicely finished documents of already fully calculated houses. If you then sign these, of course you have to expect additional costs as the builder. For every adjustment. But I don't understand the question either, because an offer is always variable when it comes to adjustments and upgrades. Of course, this also includes the KfW or the roof pitch, altered knee wall, etc.
 

Tichu78

2015-01-30 09:47:05
  • #5
The offer is a custom-made offer. The general contractor (GU) has been given the development plan and all necessary information. The design had an impermissible roof pitch, and in my opinion, the knee wall is also not possible, provided that the foundation slab has to be set at the height of the sidewalk surface edge. I noticed this and clarified it with the GU and will receive a corrected design in the next few days.
What troubled me was the question of what would have happened if (as a layperson) I had not noticed this and had "in good faith" signed the contract including an impermissible design.

Mistakes happen; the question is always who takes responsibility for them. And I wanted to know that in advance. This has absolutely nothing to do with trying to deceive the GU or gaining an unfair advantage. On the contrary, I want to avoid that, because discrepancies cost time and money. And we all know how often that happens in construction, and then it’s about finding the responsible party... and the stress begins. Therefore, I prefer to check things beforehand as far as possible for me. This is also the reason why I have not been building for half a year already, because I am preparing as well as possible for the upcoming project and not just blindly plunging into it. I don’t care how others do it or if others see that as wasted time. I want to build with a good feeling and be convinced that I have a competent partner by my side whom I can trust not to exploit my ignorance and to take responsibility for their own mistakes, as I do.

If I had signed the first offer six months ago with the knowledge I have now, I would be living today in a house with poorer technology, special requests that were "pushed on me," less living space, higher costs that were not yet known to me at that time, and a fixed price that would certainly have risen by 20%. I am sure that today I am getting more house for my money and have less reason to be annoyed about why I did not inform myself better in advance (as you also require).

Get well soon!
 

ypg

2015-01-30 10:09:50
  • #6
Get well soon!

Thank you

... Therefore, I’ll save myself from quoting, I tolerate your question because trouble is predictable. But your question could have been asked a bit more neutrally!

Be that as it may: women, wives, and housewives also belong to the legally competent group.
If this wife or housewife also wants to be involved in this new building, even if only through signature and/or moving in, then she should also memorize (have to memorize) a few measurements, numbers, and sentences from the development plan or the terms and conditions.

Asking the builder costs nothing, and if he blocks or brushes off, then you should go to another one.
Confusions can always happen.

Off Topic: why do I often have the feeling here in the forum that the wives of male members only deal with trivial matters (can/may)?
 

Similar topics
20.07.2013Do the costs increase with a higher knee wall?12
13.11.2013Initial Draft Floor Plan - Opinions Welcome21
09.02.2014Bungalow Floor Plan Draft Opinions22
25.02.2014Single-family house floor plan design23
02.03.2014Draft floor plan: Ground floor planning27
06.04.2014Planning floor plan / first draft for first feedback32
27.07.2015Floor plan and house design - opinions & criticism15
12.10.2016Kniestock lowered afterwards34
13.06.2017First draft floor plan single-family house (approx. 200 sqm) - Please provide feedback46
13.08.2017Change of roof pitch from 25 degrees10
25.04.2018Kniestock Danwood House in Schleswig-Holstein - What is the maximum possible?23
10.06.2018Build a house with a knee wall 75cm high or two full stories? Your opinion?17
12.09.2018Development plan: Should the roof slopes of the dwelling houses be adapted to each other?13
18.01.2019Single-family house design - approx. 160-170 sqm / Innovative pitched roof71
04.09.2020Full floors in the timber-framed house with a 53-degree roof pitch.20
27.08.2019Building plan stipulates knee wall is inadmissible16
09.08.2023First high open space without knee wall26
02.09.2021The maximum height of the knee wall, everyone says something different.16
20.05.2023Large dormers or high knee wall?33
27.06.2023How to achieve Bremer 2/3 solution with high knee wall?13

Oben