MarlenP
2022-08-31 12:31:41
- #1
Hello everyone,
we want to build a house with 2 residential units on a 472m2 plot (Unit 1: 143.39 m2 / Unit 2: 69.57 m2). The 2nd residential unit is intended for my parents and the main residential unit for my family with a husband and 3 children (7/13/17 years old). Since our plot is relatively small, we want to build a compact house so that we have as much garden space as possible. We are currently in the final planning phase and would like to get feedback from you on our building project. We have the uncertain feeling that we might have forgotten something essential or not paid enough attention to it because we focused more on the compactness of the house in the planning.
Development plan/restrictions
Plot size: 472m2
Slope: no
Plot ratio: 0.4
Floor area ratio: 0.6
Building window, building line and boundary
Edge development: south and east
Number of parking spaces: 2
Number of floors: 2
Roof type: hip roof
Style:
Orientation: south/west
Maximum heights/limits: 10m
Other requirements
Requirements of the builders
Style, roof type, building type: city villa
Basement, floors: no
Number of people, age: 1st unit 5 (43, 38, 17, 13, 7). 2nd unit (both over 60)
Room requirements on ground floor, upper floor:
Office: family use or home office? -
Guests per year: 2-3 times a year
Open or closed architecture: open
Conservative or modern construction: modern
Open kitchen, cooking island; open kitchen, no cooking island
Number of dining seats: 5
Fireplace: no
Music/stereo wall: no
Balcony, roof terrace: no
Garage, carport: garage
Utility garden, greenhouse: no
Other wishes/special features/daily routine, also reasons why this or that should or should not be
The house should be compact but still appear spacious.
House design
Who designed it:
- Planner from a construction company
- Architect: From the architect
- Do-it-yourself
What do you particularly like? Why? It is a relatively small house with 2 residential units.
What do you not like? Why? Maybe the rooms (children’s rooms and the rooms in the granny flat) are too small?
Price estimate according to architect/planner: approx. 600,000€
Personal price limit for the house, including equipment: 650,000€
Preferred heating technology: district heating
If you had to give up, on which details/extensions
- could you give up: Actually nothing – we have already reduced everything to the minimum.
- could you not give up: The number of planned rooms
Why is the design the way it is now? For example,
Standard design from the planner?
Which wishes were implemented by the architect? Yes
A mix of many examples from various magazines...
What makes it particularly good or bad in your opinion?
What is the most important/fundamental question regarding the floor plan summarized in 130 characters?
We wanted the house to be as compact as possible. Maybe we placed too much emphasis on compactness and neglected other essential things.
What do you like about the house, what not so much, and what is absolutely unacceptable?

we want to build a house with 2 residential units on a 472m2 plot (Unit 1: 143.39 m2 / Unit 2: 69.57 m2). The 2nd residential unit is intended for my parents and the main residential unit for my family with a husband and 3 children (7/13/17 years old). Since our plot is relatively small, we want to build a compact house so that we have as much garden space as possible. We are currently in the final planning phase and would like to get feedback from you on our building project. We have the uncertain feeling that we might have forgotten something essential or not paid enough attention to it because we focused more on the compactness of the house in the planning.
Development plan/restrictions
Plot size: 472m2
Slope: no
Plot ratio: 0.4
Floor area ratio: 0.6
Building window, building line and boundary
Edge development: south and east
Number of parking spaces: 2
Number of floors: 2
Roof type: hip roof
Style:
Orientation: south/west
Maximum heights/limits: 10m
Other requirements
Requirements of the builders
Style, roof type, building type: city villa
Basement, floors: no
Number of people, age: 1st unit 5 (43, 38, 17, 13, 7). 2nd unit (both over 60)
Room requirements on ground floor, upper floor:
Office: family use or home office? -
Guests per year: 2-3 times a year
Open or closed architecture: open
Conservative or modern construction: modern
Open kitchen, cooking island; open kitchen, no cooking island
Number of dining seats: 5
Fireplace: no
Music/stereo wall: no
Balcony, roof terrace: no
Garage, carport: garage
Utility garden, greenhouse: no
Other wishes/special features/daily routine, also reasons why this or that should or should not be
The house should be compact but still appear spacious.
House design
Who designed it:
- Planner from a construction company
- Architect: From the architect
- Do-it-yourself
What do you particularly like? Why? It is a relatively small house with 2 residential units.
What do you not like? Why? Maybe the rooms (children’s rooms and the rooms in the granny flat) are too small?
Price estimate according to architect/planner: approx. 600,000€
Personal price limit for the house, including equipment: 650,000€
Preferred heating technology: district heating
If you had to give up, on which details/extensions
- could you give up: Actually nothing – we have already reduced everything to the minimum.
- could you not give up: The number of planned rooms
Why is the design the way it is now? For example,
Standard design from the planner?
Which wishes were implemented by the architect? Yes
A mix of many examples from various magazines...
What makes it particularly good or bad in your opinion?
What is the most important/fundamental question regarding the floor plan summarized in 130 characters?
We wanted the house to be as compact as possible. Maybe we placed too much emphasis on compactness and neglected other essential things.
What do you like about the house, what not so much, and what is absolutely unacceptable?