AHLK2022
2022-03-02 00:01:58
- #1
The only fixed things are the double garage (must be because 1.5 parking spaces per residential unit are required) and the outer walls due to boundary construction. Also, the single-family house and the house with 3 residential units must have the same height since they are connected. Inside, we can do whatever we want. Whether it's 214/215 or less doesn't matter to the developer... the price is fixed, and he will not lower it if we reduce square meters. To be honest, I initially found the price (before your opinions ;) really fair/cheap. In our previous search, the level was about 700k for 140-160 sqm new build semi-detached house or end-terrace house without a basement. So I thought, great, 60 sqm and a larger "plot" for "only" 60k more. But I already have a feeling why it's quite "cheap".... :/But only in the highly hypothetical theory, because I hardly see the interests coming together here: the OP would benefit from having a nice "house" built on the so-called special use area, let's benevolently call it "property," which doesn't fully exhaust the building volume "budget"; the developer, on the other hand, wants to realize the sold 216 sqm area. If the OP fills the "outer wall frame" so differently that only 215 or 214 sqm result: the developer will still go along with that. But for example only 150 or 170 sqm? – the developer will only participate if the OP pays him just as much as if the fully packed 216 sqm were realized. Creating such freedom for a nicer design would mean about a 1.3/1.4-fold "price per square meter" in this example. Frankly, I don't consider a developer who hatches such projects intellectually capable of that ;-)